<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<XML>
<JOURNAL>
<YEAR>1405</YEAR>
<VOL>35</VOL>
<NO>1</NO>
<MOSALSAL>153</MOSALSAL>
<PAGE_NO>91</PAGE_NO>


<ARTICLES>

	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ تاثیر کود آمینو اسید تهیه شده از ضایعات کپور معمولی (Cyprinus carpio) بر شاخص‌‌های رشد و ترکیبات گیاه گوجه‌‌فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum) در شرایط گلخانه‌‌ای</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Effect of amino acid fertilizer derived from common carp (Cyprinus carpio) waste on growth indices and quality attributes of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under greenhouse conditions</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>پژوهش حاضر، با هدف استفاده بهینه از ضایعات ماهی کپور معمولی (Cyprinus carpio) و تبدیل آن به محصولی ارزشمند در کشاورزی، به بررسی اثر کود آمینواسید حاصل از هیدرولیز آنزیمی بر شاخص&#8204;های رشد و کیفیت گوجه&#8204;فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum) در شرایط گلخانه&#8204;ای پرداخته است. ضایعات ماهی پس از فرآیند هیدرولیز آنزیمی با آنزیم&#8204;های آلکالاز و فلاورزایم به پپتیدها و اسیدهای آمینه کوچکتر تبدیل شدند. محصول حاصله از نظر تجزیه&#8204;&#8204;وتحلیل کیفی شامل پپتیدهای محلول، الگوی وزن مولکولی، درجه هیدرولیز، محتوای اسیدهای آمینه کل و آزاد، ترکیبات معدنی اصلی و ریزمغذی&#8204;ها، ویژگی&#8204;های فیزیکی و شاخص&#8204;های میکروبی عمومی و اندیکاتور بررسی شد. سپس کود تولیدی بر پایه هیدرولیز ضایعات کپور معمولی فرموله گردید و پایداری آن طی سه ماه نگهداری مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. آزمایش گلخانه&#8204;ای در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با پنج تیمار شامل تیمار شاهد، کود آمینواسید پایه (E)، کود غنی&#8204;شده با پتاسیم و فسفر (EKP)، کود تجاری داخلی (I) و کود وارداتی (Ex)، هر کدام با پنج تکرار انجام شد. شاخص&#8204;های مورفوفیزیولوژیک (ارتفاع بوته، تعداد برگ و وزن خشک اندام&#8204;ها) و شاخص&#8204;های کیفی میوه شامل کلروفیل برگ، ماده جامد محلول (TSS)، لیکوپن و ویتامین C اندازه&#8204;گیری گردید. نتایج نشان داد، کود آمینواسید کپور معمولی دارای محتوای اسیدهای آمینه کل 87/13 درصد و آزاد 67/7 درصد بود و پایداری مناسبی در دوره نگهداری داشت. تیمار EKP بیشترین اثر مثبت را بر رشد گیاه، افزایش وزن و تعداد میوه و بهبود ویژگی&#8204;های کیفی محصول نشان داد و از نظر آماری بر سایر تیمارها برتری داشت. همچنین مقایسه با کودهای تجاری بیانگر کارایی بالاتر کود تولیدی بود. استفاده از کود آمینواسید تولیدی از ضایعات ماهی کپور معمولی، علاوه بر بهبود چشمگیر شاخص&#8204;های رشد و کیفیت گوجه&#8204;فرنگی، با توجه به هزینه تولید پایین و بازگشت سریع سرمایه، می&#8204;تواند به عنوان یک راهکار دانش&#8204;بنیان و پایدار در صنعت کشاورزی معرفی گردد. پژوهش حاضر، گامی مؤثر در عرصه اقتصاد چرخشی و ارزش&#8204;آفرینی از پسماندهای صنایع شیلاتی محسوب می&#8204;شود.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction
Amino acid fertilizers are recognized as effective bio-stimulants that contain both free and bound amino acids, playing vital roles in enhancing plant growth, development, and stress resilience (Rouphael and Colla, 2020). These compounds serve as fundamental components of proteins, supplying essential nitrogen and carbon, while also boosting metabolic processes and improving crop quality (Garcia and Perez, 2021). Common sources of amino acid fertilizers include plant, microbial, and animal proteins, which undergo hydrolysis to release peptides and amino acids that plants can readily absorb (Chen et al., 2019). Tomato, a major greenhouse crop, has shown significant improvements in chlorophyll content, vegetative growth, yield, and quality when treated with amino acid fertilizers (Gasana and Kim, 2020).&#160; Specific amino acids such as lysine, arginine, and proline are known to help plants withstand environmental stresses like drought, salinity, and temperature variations (Garcia and Perez, 2021). A sustainable and innovative source for these fertilizers is fish processing waste, particularly from common carp, which is rich in proteins. Repurposing these by-products not only reduces environmental impact but also creates valuable agricultural inputs. Previous research confirms that fish waste-derived amino acid fertilizers can enhance plant growth, increase fruit yield, and improve biochemical traits such as protein and chlorophyll levels (Chen et al., 2019). Given the rising demand for sustainable agriculture, this study explores the potential of amino acid fertilizers made from carp waste to support eco-friendly tomato production (Rouphael and Colla, 2020).
Methodology
The research was carried out at the Caspian Sea Ecology Research Center in Sari, Iran. Common carp waste including skin, viscera, heads, and fins was collected from local markets, frozen, and processed via enzymatic hydrolysis using Alcalase and Flavourzyme (Safari et al., 2016; Safari et al., 2018; Safari et al., 2020). The process included pasteurization, enzyme treatment under controlled pH and temperature, and heat inactivation. The resulting hydrolysate was then centrifuged, filtered, and stored for further analysis.
Chemical and physicochemical properties such as total protein, soluble protein, peptide size, degree of hydrolysis, ash, fat, moisture, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH, salinity, and amino acid composition were evaluated using standard methods (Hesse, 1971; Adler-Nissen and Olsen, 1979; James, 1995; Moore, 2004; AOAC, 2005; ISIRI, 2008a, b, c; APHA, 2017).
&#160;Microbiological safety was verified through tests for aerobic bacteria, yeast, mold, coliforms, E. coli, and Salmonella (Sallam, 2007; ISIRI 8923-1, 2007; ISO 21527-1, 2008; Hern&#225;ndez et al., 2009; ISIRI 11166, 2010; ISIRI 10889-3, 2013; ISO 4833-1, 2013; ISIRI 13321-2, 2014). A greenhouse trial using a completely randomized design tested five treatments: control, enzyme hydrolysate, enzyme hydrolysate enriched with phosphorus and potassium, a domestic commercial fertilizer, and an imported commercial fertilizer. Tomato seedlings in pots received weekly foliar applications, and parameters related to growth and quality such as plant height, leaf count, leaf area, fruit yield, chlorophyll, TSS, lycopene, and vitamin C were measured (Abbasi et al., 2003; Boras et al., 2011). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan&#8217;s test.
Results
The hydrolysis process significantly increased total protein content from 15.17% in raw waste to 76.61% in the final product. Fat and moisture decreased, while ash and organic nitrogen levels rose. The hydrolysate had a hydrolysis degree of 21.11%, soluble protein of 26.87 mg/mL, and contained 13.87% total amino acids and 7.67% free amino acids, including essential types like lysine and leucine. It exhibited desirable physical traits, was water-soluble, and met safety standards with no pathogenic contamination. Storage studies confirmed the product&#8217;s stability over three months. In the greenhouse, the enriched hydrolysate treatment led to the best results in plant height, leaf number, leaf area, fruit count, and fruit weight. It also outperformed other treatments in chlorophyll levels, TSS, lycopene, and vitamin C content.
Discussion and conclusion
Enzymatic hydrolysis successfully transformed carp waste into a plant-friendly fertilizer rich in bioavailable peptides and amino acids (He et al., 2013; Safari et al., 2016; Safari et al., 2018; Safari et al., 2020). The resulting product was safe, stable, and effective as a foliar spray (FAO, 2010; L&#243;pez-Caballero et al., 2010; Ortizo et al., 2020). Key amino acids supported chlorophyll formation and nitrogen metabolism, leading to better growth and fruit quality (Colla et al., 2015; Rouphael et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018). The enriched hydrolysate treatment demonstrated synergistic benefits, enhancing both yield and nutritional quality of tomatoes (Colla et al., 2014; Bulgari et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). This method offers a sustainable way to upcycle fish waste into a high-value agricultural input (Kumar and Singh, 2019; Martinez and Smith, 2020; Ciepiela and Kamińska, 2021).
Further optimization and testing on other crops could broaden the application of this biofertilizer (Zhou et al., 2019; He et al., 2020). In summary, common carp waste-derived amino acid fertilizer presents an eco-friendly and efficient alternative to synthetic fertilizers in greenhouse tomato cultivation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors extend their gratitude to the Caspian Sea Ecology Research Center for providing the necessary facilities and support.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>11</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/13
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/30
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1405/2/10
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>رضا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>صفری</Family>
				<NameE>reza</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>safari</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، ، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>safari1351@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>زهرا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>یعقوب زاده</Family>
				<NameE>zahra</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>yaghoubzadeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، ، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>za_yaghoub@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>فائزه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>ترک پهنابی</Family>
				<NameE>Faezeh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Turk Pahnabi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، ، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>pahnabifaezeh@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Amino acid fertilizer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>common carp waste</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>tomato</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>enzymatic hydrolysis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>کود آمینواسید</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ضایعات کپور معمولی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>گوجه‌فرنگی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>هیدرولیز آنزیمی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Abbasi, P.A., Cuppels, D.A., Lazarovits, G., 2003. Effect of foliar applications of neem oil and fish emulsion on bacterial spot and yield of tomatoes and peppers. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 25(1), pp.41–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309507048.##Adler-Nissen, J., Olsen, H.S., 1979. The influence of peptide chain length on taste and functional properties of enzymatically modified soy protein. Journal of Food Science, 44(2), pp.456–462. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1979-0092.ch007.##AOAC, 2005. Official Method of Analysis. 17th ed. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.##APHA, 2017. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 17th ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.##Araújo, E.F., dos Santos, V.L., de Almeida, M.V., 2015. Microbiological safety of fish protein hydrolysates produced in Brazil. Food Control, 50, pp.832–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.09.023.##Boran, M., Karaçal, S., 2021. Fish protein hydrolysates as a source of bioactive peptides for food and agriculture. Food Chemistry, 357, 129805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129805.##Boras, M., Zidan, R., Halloum, W., 2011. Effect of amino acids on growth, production and quality of tomato in plastic greenhouse. Biolog Sci Series, 33(5), pp.229–238.##Bulgari, R., Cocetta, G., Trivellini, P., Vernieri, P., Ferrante, A., 2015. Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biological Agriculture &#38; Horticulture, 31(1), pp.1–17.##Chen, Z., Wang, Y. &#38; Wang, X., 2019. Effects of fish waste-derived amino acid fertilizers on tomato growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, 45(3), pp.123–130.##Ciepiela, G.A., Kamińska, I., 2021. Efficiency of organic and mineral fertilizers in sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(2), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020806.##Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., Bonini, P., Rouphael, Y. and Rea, E., 2015. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 1065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01065.##Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Canaguier, R., Svecova, E. &#38; Cardarelli, M., 2014. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, p.448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00448.##FAO, 2010. Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. FAO Water Reports 35. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i1954e/i1954e.pdf.##Garcia, M. and Perez, L., 2021. The role of fish waste-derived amino acids in mitigating abiotic stress in crops. Environmental Agriculture, 7(4), pp.200–208.##Gasana, Q.G. and Kim, D.H., 2020. Effect of foliar spraying mixed with fish amino acids (FAA) and oriental herbal nutrient (OHN) extract on growth, yield and quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Rwanda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(1), pp.127–136.##Guo, W., Zhang, H., Sun, C. &#38; Xie, C., 2018. Impact of fish protein hydrolysates on plant growth and antioxidant activity in tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(3), pp.346–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.1357894.##He, S., Zhang, X. &#38; Xu, X., 2013. Degree of hydrolysis and molecular weight distribution of fish protein hydrolysate and its effects on plant growth. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(18), pp.4531–4538.##He, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Wang, L. &#38; Liu, Z., 2020. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of fish processing by-products and characterization of protein hydrolysates. Food Chemistry, 312, 126033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126033. ##Hernández, F., Sgorbati, S. &#38; Chiesa, L.M., 2019. Effect of fish hydrolysate and amino acid fertilizer on tomato yield and quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 246, pp.99–105.##Hesse, P. R 1971. A Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis. John Nurray Williams Clowes and sons Ltd. London 324pp.##James, C.S. 1995. Analytical Chemistry of Foods, Springer, New York, doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2165-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2165-5. ##Kim, S.-K. and Mendis, E., 2006. Bioactive compounds from marine processing byproducts – A review. Food Research International, 39(4), pp.383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.10.010.##Kumar, A. and Singh, P., 2019. Use of fish protein hydrolysate in organic tomato cultivation. Journal of Organic Agriculture, 9(1), pp.15–22.##López-Caballero, M.E., Gómez-Guillén, M.C. and Montero, P., 2010. Antioxidant activity of fish protein hydrolysates: Application to tomato growth. Food Chemistry, 123(1), pp.33–40.##Martinez, L., and Smith, D. (2020). Sustainable Agriculture Using Fish Waste Amino Acids. Journal of Organic Agriculture, 12(2), 98-105.##Moore, J. 2004. Amino acid analysis of hydrolysates (feed, fxal, etc), Michign State University, Department of Animal Sciences, Nathalie Trottiers Laboratory.##Rouphael, Y. and Colla, G., 2020. Toward a sustainable agriculture through plant biostimulants: From experimental data to practical applications. Agriculture, 10(10), p.146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1010146.##Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Giordano, M., El-Nakhel, C., Kyriacou, M.C. and De Pascale, S., 2017. Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Scientia horticulturae, 226, pp.353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.007.##Safari, S., Ghorbani, R., Motamedzadegan, A. and Hosseini, S.V., 2016. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis conditions for rainbow trout waste. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 25(5), pp.667–678.##Safari, S., Motamedzadegan, A. and Hosseini, S.V., 2020. Shelf-life and nutrient stability of fish-based amino acid fertilizers. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44(3), e14321.##Safari, S., Motamedzadegan, A., Ghorbani, R. and Hosseini, S.V., 2018. Production of amino acid fertilizer from rainbow trout waste using Alcalase and Flavourzyme. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 17(2), pp.345–358.##Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Duan, W. and Wang, J., 2018. Effects of amino acid-based biostimulants on tomato fruit quality and yield. Scientia Horticulturae, 230, pp.22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.022.##Zhou, P., Wang, H., Wang, H., Liu, Q. and Jin, Y., 2019. Production and characterization of fish protein hydrolysates from marine fish by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Chemistry, 283, pp.125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.019.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ افزودن نانوکپسول‌‌های حامل و فرم آزاد پپتیدهای زیست‌‌فعال حاصل از هیدرولیز آنزیمی فانوس‌ماهی (Benthosema pterotum) به فرمولاسیون دوغ و ارزیابی خصوصیات میکروبی، شیمیایی و حسی محصول</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Adding carrier nanocapsules and free form of bioactive peptides derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of lanternfish (Benthosema pterotum) to doogh formulation and evaluating the microbial, chemical and sensory properties of the product</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>عوارض خطرناک نگهدارنده&#8204;&#8204;های شیمیایی برای سلامت مصرف&#8204;&#8204;کنندگان، حدود دو دهه است که توجه محققین را به سمت استخراج و تولید ترکیبات طبیعی قابل جایگزین با نگهدارنده&#8204;&#8204;های شیمیایی معطوف کرده است. از مهم&#8204;&#8204;ترین ترکیبات با منشاء طبیعی که فعالیت ضد باکتریایی و آنتی&#8204;&#8204;اکسیدانی آنها در تحقیقات مختلف تائید شده است، می&#8204;&#8204;توان به پروتئین&#8204;&#8204;های هیدرولیزشده یا پپتیدهای زیست&#8204;&#8204;فعال اشاره کرد. در تحقیق حاضر، پپتیدهایی با وزن مولکولی کمتر از 3 کیلودالتون از فانوس ماهی (Benthosema pterotum) به روش آنزیمی جداسازی و سپس با کمک تکنیک خشک&#8204;&#8204;کردن انجمادی و پوشش ترکیبی مالتودکسترین-صمغ عربی (با نسبت برابر) نانوریزپوشانی شدند. سپس نانوکپسول&#8204;&#8204;های حامل (200 و 400 میکروگرم بر میلی&#8204;&#8204;لیتر) و پپتیدهای آزاد (400 و 500 میکروگرم بر میلی&#8204;&#8204;لیتر) به فرمولاسیون دوغ اضافه و خصوصیات کیفی محصول طی 60 روز نگهداری در دمای یخچال ارزیابی گردید. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای حاوی نانوکپسول&#8204;&#8204;های حامل نسبت به شاهد و تیمارهای حاوی پپتیدهای آزاد، در زمینه مهار رشد Staphylococcus aureus &#160;و Escherichia coli و حذف رادیکال آزاد ABTS موفق&#8204;&#8204;تر عمل کردند (05/0p&#60;). ضمن این&#8204;که pH، اسیدیته و فعالیت حذف رادیکال این تیمارها برخلاف شاهد و تیمارهای حاوی پپتیدهای آزاد، طی دوره نگهداری فاقد تغییر معنی&#8204;&#8204;داری بودند (05/0&#60;p). با افزایش غلظت پپتیدهای آزاد و نانوکپسول&#8204;&#8204;های حامل، شمارش باکتری&#8204;&#8204;ها و قدرت مهار رادیکال ABTS در تیمارها به&#8204;ترتیب کاهش و افزایش یافتند (05/0p&#60;). اما pH و اسیدیته تحت تأثیر قرار نگرفتند. ارزیابی رنگ، بو و مزه تیمارها نشان داد که فقط امتیازات تیمار حاوی 400 میکروگرم بر میلی&#8204;&#8204;لیتر نانوکپسول&#8204;&#8204;های حامل در روز اول و 60 برابر بود (05/0&#60;p) اما در سایر تیمارها، امتیازات شاخص&#8204;&#8204;های حسی در طول دوره نگهداری به صورت معنی&#8204;&#8204;داری کاهش یافتند (05/0p&#60;). یافته&#8204;&#8204;های این پژوهش نشان داد که نانوکپسولاسیون پپتیدهای زیست&#8204;&#8204;فعال با استفاده از روش خشک&#8204;&#8204;کردن انجمادی و پوشش ترکیبی مالتودکسترین-صمغ عربی، تکنیک موثری به منظور ارتقاء و پایداری خواص نگهدارندگی آنها برای استفاده در صنعت لبنیات (به&#8204;ویژه دوغ) است.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction
The chemical types of antioxidants and antimicrobial compounds used in food industries as preservatives causes some diseases in consumers due to their harmful effects (Reyhani et al., 2024). For this reason, over the last two decades, various researches have been conducted to produce and extract preservative compounds of natural origin, and have yielded acceptable results. Hydrolyzed proteins or bioactive peptides that one of the sources of their production are aquatic animals (with low marketability) and the wastes from their processing, are antioxidant (Ng and Wong, 2024) and antimicrobial (Rivera-P&#233;rez et al., 2023) compounds of natural origin. The use of bioactive peptides in food formulations as preservatives always requires the use of a suitable protection system in harsh environmental conditions. Because the structure of peptides may be destroyed in thermal processes during food production. One of the appropriate protection systems for active compounds is encapsulation, which is usually done by spray drying and freeze drying methods (Sarabandi et al., 2020). During this process, a microcapsule or nanocapsule is created around the bioactive peptides, which protects these compounds from possible changes in adverse conditions. Meanwhile, the capsules formed around the peptide in this technique release their contents at a controlled rate and under special conditions (Rao et al., 2016). Doogh is one of the favorite drinks of Iranians, which is produced from the lactic fermentation of milk. Due to its low pH and rich in nutrients, this product suffers from bacterial contamination, especially at ambient temperature, which ultimately causes spoilage and changes in its aroma during storage (Karimi et al., 2022). This is an important challenge in the milk industry. On the other hand, due to the disadvantages of chemical preservatives, it is very important to use natural preservatives that can solve this problem. The aim of the present research in the first stage is the nanoencapsulation of bioactive peptides obtained from lanternfish (Benthosema pterotum) by freeze drying method and maltodextrin-gum Arabic combined coating. In the next step, carrier nanocapsules and free peptides are used in doogh formulation and the microbial, chemical and sensory properties of the product are evaluated during 60 days of storage at refrigerator temperature.
Methodology
Lanternfish (B. pterotum) were hydrolyzed using Protamex enzyme under optimal conditions (50&#186;C, Amount of enzyme: 30 Anson units, 90 min) and then by ultrafiltration, peptides with a molecular weight of less than 3 kilodaltons were isolated. Then these peptides were encapsulated using the freeze drying method and combined maltodextrin-gum Arabic coating. In the next step, carrier nanocapsules (200 and 400 &#181;g/ml) and free peptides (400 and 500 &#181;g/ml) were added to the doogh formulation. Finally, Microbial (Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli count), antioxidant (ABTS radical scavenging activity), chemical (pH and acidity) and sensory (color, aroma and taste) properties of the product were evaluated during 60 days of storage at refrigerator temperature (4&#177;1&#176;C). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA in SPSS22 software) and the difference between the means was evaluated by Duncan&#39;s test at 95% confidence level (p&#60;0.05).
Result
The results showed that the treatments containing nanocapsules carrying bioactive peptides (200 and 400 &#181;g/ml) were more successful in inhibiting the growth and proliferation of S. aureus and E. coli bacteria as well as removing the ABTS free radical during the storage period compared to the control and the treatments containing free peptides (400 and 500 &#181;g/ml) (p&#60;0.05). The number of S. aureus bacteria in treatments containing 400 and 500 &#181;g/ml of bioactive peptides as well as treatments containing 200 and 400 &#181;g/ml of carrier nanocapsules on the first day of storage was 3.26 &#177; 0.08, 2.25&#177;0.12, 2.24&#177;0.09 and 1.11&#177;0.06 Log CFU/mL, respectively. These numbers ​​for Escherichia coli were recorded as 4.42&#177;0.09, 3.21&#177;0.17, 3.23&#177;0.11, and 1.94&#177;0.08 Log CFU/mL, respectively. The ABTS free radical scavenging rate in these treatments was measured on the same day as 29.73&#177;1.11, 35.52&#177;1.72, 39.65&#177;2.12, and 47.14&#177;1.18 Unit/ml, respectively. By increasing the concentration of free peptides (from 400 to 500 &#181;g/ml) and carrier nanocapsules (from 200 to 400 &#181;g/ml), as well as the storage time (1, 20, 40 and 60 days), the number of bacteria under study in the treatments decreased significantly (p&#60;0.05). pH, acidity and ABTS radical scavenging power of treatments containing 200 and 400 &#181;g/ml carrier nanocapsules did not change significantly during the storage period (p&#62;0.05) and had a constant trend. While in treatments containing free peptides and control, antioxidant activity and pH decreased (p&#60;0.05), but acidity increased by increasing storage time (p&#60;0.05). The pH values ​​for the control, treatments containing 400 and 500 &#956;g/mL of bioactive peptides, as well as 200 and 400 &#956;g/mL of carrier nanocapsules on day 60 of storage were measured as 3.03&#177;0.02, 3.55&#177;0.01, 3.56&#177;0.05, 4.74&#177;0.04, and 4.75&#177;0.09, respectively. These values ​​for acidity were recorded as 0.85&#177;0.03, 0.67&#177;0.02, 0.68&#177;0.01, 0.36&#177;0.07, and 0.37&#177;0.03, respectively. By increasing the concentration of free peptides (from 400 to 500 &#181;g/ml) and carrier nanocapsules (from 200 to 400 &#181;g/ml) in doogh, the antioxidant activity (ABTS free radical scavenging power) of the treatments increased significantly (p&#60;0.05), but the pH and acidity values ​​of them did not change (p&#62;0.05). The evaluation of sensory indicators (color, smell and taste) of doogh samples showed that only the treatment containing 400 &#181;g/ml of carrier nanocapsules on the first and 60 day earned equal points (p&#62;0.05), but in other treatments, the sensory indicators during the storage period were significantly have decreased (p&#60;0.05). Of course, the treatment containing 200&#181;g/ml also had equal points in two color and smell indices on the first day and 60, but the score of the taste index in this treatment decreased on the 60th day compared to the first day. The result of examining the sensory indicators of different treatments compared to the control on the first day showed that adding bioactive peptides and carrier nanocapsules to the doogh formulation had no significant effect (positive or negative) on the color, smell and taste of the product.
Discussion and conclusion
The reduction in the number of S. aureus and E. coli bacteria in treatments with the addition of bioactive peptides and carrier nanocapsules indicates the ability of the aforementioned compounds to combat the growth and proliferation of the studied bacteria That in this regard and also ABTS free radica scavenging, nanocapsules carrying bioactive peptides were more successful and stronger. This finding has been recorded due to the higher active surface area of ​​the nanocapsules, as well as the capsule&#39;s (maltodextrin-gum Arabic) ability to protect the core (peptides) structure in adverse environmental conditions and its gradual release. Two mechanisms of peptides antibacterial activity are: A- Peptides are attached to the membrane of bacterial cells and create irreversible pores on the surface of the membrane, as a result of which the cytoplasm flows out of the cell and the cell is completely destroyed. Bioactive Peptides pass through the cell membrane and bind to intracellular organelles such as ribosomes and genomes and disrupt the normal growth process of the cell (Amissah, 2012). In the present research prove that the sensitivity of S. aureus, which is a Gram-positive bacteria, to free peptides and carrier nanocapsules is higher than E. coli. This higher sensitivity is related to the absence of the lipopolysaccharide layer in the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria (Reyhani Poul and Yeganeh, 2023). The results of the evaluation of pH, acidity and sensory properties of treatments during 60 days of storage showed that only in two treatments containing carrier nanocapsules, this indexes remained constant. But in the control and two treatments containing free peptides, mentioned indexes changed in a negative direction (decrease in the quality of dough). This finding indicates that in regard of controlling chemical and microbial reactions that cause food spoilage, bioactive peptides carrier nanocapsules are more powerful than free peptides. According to the obtained results, bioactive peptides from lanternfish with a molecular weight of less than 3 kilodaltons can be used as a natural preservative in the formulation of doogh. Also, if these peptides are nanoencapsulated using a combined maltodextrin-gum Arabic coating and freeze-drying technique, the resulting nanocapsules more actively combat oxidative and bacterial spoilage in doogh during storage at refrigerated temperatures.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
The Authors would like to thank the Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU), for financial support of this research under contract number, 03-1404-03.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>13</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>31</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/52025/08/26
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/6/4
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/302026/04/30
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1405/2/10
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>سکینه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>یگانه</Family>
				<NameE>Sakineh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yeganeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دامی و شیلات، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>skyeganeh@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>سهیل</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>ریحانی پول</Family>
				<NameE>Soheyl</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Reyhani Poul</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه فرآوری محصولات شیلاتی، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>soheylreyhani@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>فائزه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>ترک پهنابی</Family>
				<NameE>Faezeh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tork pahnabi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دامی و شیلات، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>pahnabifaezeh@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>فرزانه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>شاکریان</Family>
				<NameE>Farzaneh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shakerian</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دامی و شیلات، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>farzaneshakerian64@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Bioactive peptides</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Doogh</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>پپتیدهای زیست‌‌فعال</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>صمغ عربی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>دوغ</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>فعالیت آنتی‌‌اکسیدانی و ضد میکروبی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Abd Rashid, N.Y., Manan, M.A., Pa'ee, K.F., Saari, N. and Wong, F.W.F., 2022. Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of fish protein hydrolysate produced from Malaysian fish sausage (Keropok Lekor) by-products by indigenous Lactobacillus casei fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347: 131-147. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131303##Ahmadi, S.M., Moslehi Shad, M. and Rahimi, A., 2018. Investigation of antimicrobial activity of oleoresin essential oil on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Penicillium notatum and its effect on Iranian doogh shelf life. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 15(85): 114-124.##Amissah, J., 2012. Bioactive Properties of Salmon Skin Protein Hydrolysates (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University Libraries). ##Akbarbaglu, Z., Kamali, S. A., Sarabandi, K. and Sadeghi, M. A., 2021. Effect of maltodextrin and gum Arabic carriers on the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of spraydried casein hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 107 (17): 131-145. DOI: 11.17.10. Fsct/10.29252##AOAC., 2005. Official Methods of Analysis Chemists (14th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.##Ayrapetyan, O.N., Obluchinskaya, E.D., Zhurishkina, E.V., Skorik, Y.A., Lebedev, D.V., Kulminskaya, A.A. and Lapina, I. M., 2021. Antibacterial properties of fucoidans from the brown algae Fucus vesiculosus L. of the Barents Sea. Biology, 10(1): 67-82. DOI: 10.3390/biology10010067##Baco, N., Oslan, S.N.H., Shapawi, R., Mohhtar, R.A.M., Noordin, W.N.M. and Huda, N., 2022. Antibacterial activity of functional bioactive peptides derived from fish protein hydrolysate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 967(1): 012019.##Berraquero-García, C., Pérez-Gálvez, R., Espejo-Carpio, F.J., Guadix, A., Guadix, E.M. and García-Moreno, P.J., 2023. Encapsulation of bioactive peptides by spray-drying and electrospraying. Foods, 12(10): 20-35. DOI: 10.3390/foods12102005##Du, J., Xiao, M., Sudo, N. and Liu, Q., 2024. Bioactive peptides of marine organisms: Roles in the reduction and control of cardiovascular diseases. Food Science &#38; Nutrition. 12 (8): 5271-5284. DOI:10.1002/fsn3.4183##Ferguson, L.R., Philpott, M. and Karunasinghe, N. 2004. Dietary cancer and prevention using antimutagens. Toxicology, 198(1-3), 147-159.##Gharekhan Taghar Tapeh, R., Kordjazi, M., Ahmad Nasrollahi, S., Shabanpour, B. and Adeli, A., 2020. Investigation of antioxidant properties and antibacterial activity of alginate and fucoidan extracted from Sargassum boveanum algae collected from the Persian Gulf coast. Aquaculture Sciences, 7(2): 64-76.##Hasani, S., Shahidi, M. and Ojagh, S.M., 2019. The production and evaluation of nanoliposomes containing bioactive peptides derived from fish wastes using the alkalase enzyme. Research and Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 8(1): 31-44. DOI: 10.22101/jrifst.2019.04.30.813##He, Z., Liu, G., Qiao, Z., Cao, Y. and Song, M., 2021. Novel Angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides isolated from rice wine lees: Purification, characterization, and structure-activity relationship. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8 (1): 61-74. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.746113##Hoyle, N.T. and Merritt, J. H., 1994. Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 59(1): 76-79. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb06901.x##Husni, A., Izmi, N., Ayunani, F.Z., Kartini, A., Husnayain, N. and Isnansetyo, A., 2022. Characteristics and antioxidant activity of fucoidan from Sargassum hystrix: Effect of extraction method. International Journal of Food Science, 2022(1): 45-60. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3689724##Karimi, N., Pourahmad, R., Taheri, S. and Eyvazzadeh, O., 2022. Effect of addition of bioactive peptide obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis of yogurt whey on qualitative properties of doogh. Iranian Food Science &#38; Technology Research Journal, 18(2): 249-263. DOI: 10.22067/IFSTRJ.2021.70916.1059##Kazemi, M., Ojagh, S.M., Abdollahi, M. and Alishahi, A., 2024. Extraction optimization of gel-forming proteins and collagen hydrolysate from whole lanternfish (Benthosema pterotum) with a biorefinery approach. Journal of Utilization and Cultivation of Aquatics, 13(2): 157-175. DOI: 10.22069/japu.2024.22197.1854##Librizzi, M., Martino, C., Mauro, M., Abruscato, G., Arizza, V., Vazzana, M. and Luparello, C., 2023. Natural anticancer peptides from marine animal species: evidence from in vitro cell model systems. Cancers, 16(1): 36-49. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010036##Lin, Q., Guo, Y., Li, J., He, S., Chen, Y. and Jin, H., 2023. Antidiabetic effect of collagen peptides from harpadon nehereus bones in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice by regulating oxidative stress and glucose metabolism. Marine Drugs, 21(10): 51-67. DOI: 10.3390/md21100518##Mahdavi, Y.M., Nouri, L. and Azizi, M.H., 2019. Antimicrobial activity of active peptide extracted from quinoa on Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 91(16): 315-322.##Miliauskas, G., Venskutonis, P.R. and Van Beek, T.A., 2004. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chemistry, 85(2): 231-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.05.007##Ng, W.J., Wong, F.C., Abd Manan, F., Chow, Y.L., Ooi, A.L., Ong, M.K. and Chai, T.T., 2024. Antioxidant peptides and protein hydrolysates from tilapia: cellular and in vivo evidences for human health benefits. Foods, 13(18): 2945. DOI: 10.3390/foods13182945##Ovissipour, M., Abedian, A., Motamedzadegan, A., Rasco, B., Safari, R. and Shahiri, H., 2009. The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties of protein hydrolysates from Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) viscera. Food Chemistry, 115(1): 238-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.013##Raftani Amiri, Z., Safari, R. and Bakhshandeh, T., 2015. Effect of squid protein hydrolysate (Sepia pharaonis) on quality properties of low-fat set style yoghurt. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 13(56): 11-22.##Rao, P.S., Bajaj, R.K., Mann, B., Arora, S. and Tomar, S.K., 2016. Encapsulation of antioxidant peptide enriched casein hydrolysate using maltodextrin–gum Arabic blend. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53: 3834-3843. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-016-2376-8##Reyhani Poul, S., Jafapour, S.A. and Safari, R., 2018. Evaluation of oil fatty acid profile, functional properties and antioxidants activity of hydrolyzate produced from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) viscera by application of protamex and neutrase enzymes. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 14(1): 162-176. DOI: 10.22067/ifstrj.v1395i0.53714##Reyhani Poul, S. and Yeganeh, S., 2023. Nanoencapsulation of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis using maltodextrin-sodium caseinate coating and evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the carrier nanocapsules.  Journal of Food Science and Technology, 20(140): 52-65.‎ DOI: 10.22034/FSCT.20.140.52##Reyhani Poul, S., Yeganeh, S. and Raftani Amiri, Z., 2024. Effect of using astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis as free form and as a carrier nanocapsules in formulation of tomato paste and evaluating microbial and qualitative characteristics of the product during storage at refrigerator. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 20(1): 101-117. DOI: 10.22067/ifstrj.2022.79065.1210##Rezaei, R., Yeganeh, S., Raftani Amiri, Z. and Safari, R., 2020. A survey on functional properties of protein hydrolysate from Hyrcanian goby (Neogobius caspius) by application of flavourzyme enzyme and its effect on quality of low-fat yogurt. Journal of Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 12(3): 21-36. DOI: 10.30495/jfst.2020.674131##Rivera-Pérez, C., Ponce González, X.P. and Hernández-Savedra, N.Y., 2023. Antimicrobial and anticarcinogenic activity of bioactive peptides derived from abalone viscera (Haliotis fulgens and Haliotis corrugata). Scientific Reports, 13(1): 15185. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41491-w##Safari, R., Raftani Amiri, Z., Reyhani Poul, S. and Esmaeilzadeh Kenari, R., 2022. Evaluation and comparison of antioxidant and antibacterial properties of phycocyanin extracted from spirulina algae (Spirulina Platensis) in both pure and nanoencasulated forms with maltodextrin-sodium caseinate combination coating. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 19(127): 345-358. DOI: 20.1001.1.20088787.1401.19.127.13.6##Sánchez, A. and Vázquez, A., 2017. Bioactive peptides: A review. Food Quality and Safety, 1(1): 29-46. DOI: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyx006##Santos, V.P., Marques, N.S., Maia, P.C., Lima, M.A. B.D., Franco, L.D.O. and Campos-Takaki, G.M.D., 2020. Seafood waste as attractive source of chitin and chitosan production and their applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(12): 42-56. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124290##Sarabandi, K., Jafari, S.M., Mahoonak, A.S. and Mohammadi, A., 2019. Application of gum arabic and maltodextrin for encapsulation of eggplant peel extract as a natural antioxidant and color source. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 140: 59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.133##Sarabandi, K., Gharehbeglou, P. and Jafari, S.M., 2020. Spray-drying encapsulation of protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides: Opportunities and challenges. Drying Technology, 38(5-6): 577-595. DOI:10.1080/07373937.2019.1689399##Sarada, R.M. G.P., Pillai, M.G. and Ravishankar, G.A., 1999. Phycocyanin from Spirulina sp: influence of processing of biomass on phycocyanin yield, analysis of efficacy of extraction methods and stability studies on phycocyanin. Process Biochemistry, 34(8): 795-801. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00153-8##Segura-Campos, M., Chel-Guerrero, L., Betancur-Ancona, D. and Hernandez-Escalante, V.M., 2011. Bioavailability of bioactive peptides. Food Reviews International, 27(3): 213-226. DOI:10.1080/87559129.2011.563395##Shaviklo, A. 2020. A comprehensive review on animal feed, human food and industrial application of lanternfishes; from prototypes to products. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20(11): 827-843. DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v20_11_06##Shaviklo, A. and Moradi, Y., 2019. Supplying nutritional needs of livestock and humans from lanternfishes. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 28 (4): 89-102.##Sila, A., Nedjar-Arroume, N., Hedhili, K., Chataigné, G., Balti, R., Nasri, M. and Bougatef, A., 2014. Antibacterial peptides from barbel muscle protein hydrolysates: Activity against some pathogenic bacteria. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 55(1): 183-188. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2013.07.021##Sitohy, M., Osman, A., Ghany, A. G. A. and Salama, A., 2008. Original Research Antibacterial phycocyanin from Anabaena oryzae SOS13. International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products, 8, 27-36. ##Valero, Y., Saraiva‐Fraga, M., Costas, B. and Guardiola, F.A., 2020. Antimicrobial peptides from fish: beyond the fight against pathogens. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(1): 224-253. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12314##Wang, J., Wang, Y.M., Li, L.Y., Chi, C.F. and Wang, B., 2022. Twelve antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) roe prepared by flavourzyme: Purification, sequence identification, and activity evaluation. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8 (6): 81-94. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.813780##Yaghoubzadeh, Z., Kaboosi, H., Peyravii Ghadikolaii, F., Safari, R. and Fattahi, E., 2019. Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activities of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) skin protein hydrolysate. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 28(2): 117-128. DOI:10.22092/isfj.2019.119049##Yan, M., Liu, B., Jiao, X. and Qin, S., 2014. Preparation of phycocyanin microcapsules and its properties. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 92(1): 89-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2013.07.008##Yeganeh, S. and Reyahni Poul, S., 2022. Nanoencapsulation of bioactive peptides from shrimp wastes enzymatic hydrolysis with combined coating of nanoliposome-chitosan and evaluation of antibacterial, antioxidant and antihypertensive activity of the product. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 30(6): 83-95. DOI:10.22092/isfj.2022.126070##Zabot, G.L., Schaefer Rodrigues, F., Polano Ody, L., Vinícius Tres, M., Herrera, E., Palacin, H. and Olivera-Montenegro, L., 2022. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds for food and agricultural applications. Polymers, 14(19): 41-55. DOI: 10.3390/polym14194194## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ بررسی کیفیت آب و  وضعیت تروفیک  (تغذیه ای) با تکیه بر شاخص‌های زیستی (پریفیتون و زئوپلانکتون) در رودخانه خرسان، استان چهارمحال و بختیاری</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Assessment of water quality and trophic status using biological indices (periphyton and zooplankton) in the Khersan River, Charmahal and Bakhtiari Province</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی کیفیت آب و وضعیت تروفیک(تغذیه ای) رودخانه خرسان در شهرستان لردگان (استان چهارمحال و بختیاری) انجام شد. برای ارزیابی شرایط زیستی، شاخص&#8204;های Shannon (تنوع گونه)، Evenness (یکنواختی گونه)، Saprobic (آلودگی آلی) و TDI (شاخص تروفی دیاتومه) بر اساس جوامع پریفیتون و زئوپلانکتون مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نمونه&#8204;برداری به&#8204; صورت فصلی از پاییز 1402 لغایت تابستان 1403 در پنج ایستگاه انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که در جوامع پریفیتونی پنج شاخه شامل 30 جنس و 38 گونه و در جوامع زئوپلانکتونی چهار شاخه شامل یک خانواده، 4 جنس و 13 گونه شناسایی شد. شاخه Bacillariophyta با 74 درصد و شاخه Rotifera با 56 درصد دارای بیشترین سهم گونه&#8204;ای بودند. شاخص تنوع Shannon در بیشتر ایستگاه&#8204;ها برای هر دو گروه زیستی در محدوده 1 الی 3 قرار گرفت که بیانگر شرایط آلودگی متوسط بود. شاخص یکنواختی گونه برای پریفیتون&#8204;ها 97/0 -67/0و برای زئوپلانکتون&#8204;ها 98/0 -44/0 محاسبه شد. شاخص Saproby بر اساس پریفیتون در محدوده 01/2-78/1 و بر اساس زئوپلانکتون در محدوده 01/2-51/1 قرار داشت. این نتایج نشان&#8204;دهنده شرایط آلودگی آلی متوسط[1] در همه ایستگاه&#8204;ها و فصول بود. شاخص دیاتومه نیز در محدوده 74/3-17/2 قرار گرفت که شرایط مزوتروفی تا یوتروفی را در بهار و تابستان و شرایط یوتروفی را در پاییز و زمستان نشان داد. این وضعیت بیانگر بارگذاری متوسط تا زیاد مواد مغذی در رودخانه است. بررسی&#8204;ها نشان داد که با وجود غناء فصلی مواد مغذی به&#8204;ویژه فسفر، محدودیت&#8204;های فیزیکی (جریان شدید آب و مواد معلق)، مانع افزایش زی&#8204;توده شدند. شاخهBacillariophyta&#160; نه با تراکم بیشتر بلکه با مقاومت و رقابت مؤثر، غلبه داشتند. کنترل بارگذاری مواد مغذی برای حفظ تعادل توزیع گونه&#8204;ها در آینده ضروری است. همچنین زئوپلانکتون&#8204;های غالب در همه ایستگاه&#8204;ها شاخصی از آلودگی آلی متوسط بودند که با نتایج پریفیتون&#8204;ها هم&#8204;خوانی داشت.
&#160;

[1] Beta-mesosaprobic</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction
Hydrological processes and the physicochemical characteristics of rivers have been altered by climate change, particularly due to anthropogenic influences, resulting in significant consequences for riverine habitats and aquatic ecosystems (Gilvear et al., 2002).The combined effects of severe pollutant loading and disrupted hydrodynamics associated with dam construction further diminish the ecological capacity of river systems (Zhang et al., 2019). Advances in our understanding of the structural and functional dynamics of aquatic communities now provide opportunities for more effective management of environmental instability and pollution (Ekpo, 2013). Aquatic organisms, through their continuous interactions with one another and with the surrounding water environment, play a critical role in sustaining ecosystem integrity (Caroni et al., 2013). In flowing waters, where hydrological changes are rapid and difficult to estimate, physicochemical measurements due to their instantaneous nature cannot reflect the integration of multiple environmental factors or the long-term stability of river ecosystems. Consequently, biological monitoring, employing living organisms as bioindicators, is indispensable for assessing ecological conditions and detecting change (Oertel and Salanki, 2003). This study, conducted for the first time in the Khersan River basin, focuses on the Khersan 3 Dam, a double-arch concrete dam currently under construction in Lordegan County, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. In this study, biological Indices based on periphyton and zooplankton communities were used to assess the water quality status of the Marbareh and Bashar tributaries entering the Khersan River, in order to better understanding and implement necessary conservation strategies.
Methodology
Five stations were selected for investigation: St1: Marbareh River (under the entrance bridge of Ab-Malakh village); St2: Marbareh River (under the bridge of Narmeh village);St3: Upstream of the dam site (at the beginning of the reservoir); St4: Confluence of the Bashar and Marbareh rivers (before the village of Dowrah Ghamashkeh); St5: Location of the Khersan-3 Dam reservoir (the dam is under construction). Seasonal sampling was conducted throughout 2023 and 2024. Laboratory analyses of periphyton and zooplankton followed the protocols of APHA (2017), Wetzel and Linkens (1991), and Postel et al. (2000). Taxonomic identification was guided by references including Tiffany and Britton (1971), Habit and Pankow (1976), Hartley et al. (1996), Boltovskov (2000), Kuticova (1970), and Manolova (1964). Indices of species diversity and evenness were calculated according to Mason (1982). The saprobic index was computed following Sladechek (1973), Papadimitriou et al. (2010), and Li et al. (2017), while the Diatom Trophic Index was determined using the method of Kelly and Whitton (1995). Physicochemical parameters were measured in accordance with APHA (2017) standards. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. Data were tested for normality, and non-normal distributions were normalized through logarithmic transformation. Temporal and spatial variations were examined using one-way ANOVA and Duncan&#8217;s post hoc test, and Pearson correlation was applied to explore relationships between selected physicochemical factors and biological indices.
Results
The annual qualitative and quantitative data analysis of microalgae in periphyton at sampling stations revealed the presence of 68 species. Periphyton organisms were identified across five phyla:Bacillariophyta,Cyanobacteria,Chlorophyta, Euglenozoa, and Xanthophyta. Bacillariophyta accounted for the highest percentage of species (74%). Dominant species were introduced at each station.Variance analysis comparing the mean total density of periphyton showed no significant differences between stations (p&#8805;05/0).The lower densities occurred in warmer seasons and higher densities in colder seasons.The annual analysis of zooplankton at sampling stations revealed 13 species, 4 genera, and 1 family. Zooplankton were identified across four phyla: Rotifera, Ciliophora, Cladocera, and Copepoda. Rotifera accounted for the highest percentage of species (56%). Dominant species were introduced at each station. Duncan&#8217;s test in the comparative analysis of mean total density across stations identified Station 4 as significantly different (p&#8804;05/0). zooplankton, also showed lower densities in warmer seasons and higher densities in colder seasons. Abiotic factors were measured to support biological data analysis and index values. Most stations, based on Shannon diversity index for both biological groups, fell within the range of 1 to 3, indicating moderate pollution. Species evenness index ranged: For periphyton: 0.67 to 0.97, For zooplankton: 0.44 to 0.98. Saprobic index based on periphyton ranged from 1.78 to 2.01, and for zooplankton from 1.51 to 2.01. The organic pollution index across all stations and seasons for both groups indicated &#946;-mesosaprobic conditions, or moderate organic pollution. Diatom index values ranged from 2.17 to 3.74, indicating mesotrophic to eutrophic conditions in spring and summer, and eutrophic conditions in colder seasons suggesting moderate to high nutrient loading.

Discussion and conclusion
The biological data from various stations along Khersan river during the 2023&#8211;2024 indicated&#160; that the ecological conditions of these rivers generally fall within the range of moderate organic pollution. The Shannon species diversity index for both biological groups ranged between 1 and 3, corresponding to semi-stable conditions and moderate pollution levels.The saprobic index, calculated based on periphyton (1.78&#8211;2.01) and zooplankton (1.51&#8211;2.01), also placed all stations within the &#946;-mesosaprobic range, indicating moderate organic pollution. The species evenness index showed relative balance, especially among periphyton, and species indicative of severe pollution were neither abundant nor dominant. The widespread presence of dominant diatoms such as Diatoma vulgaris and Navicula sp. both indicators of moderate pollution aligns with the saprobic index values. Similarly, the dominant zooplankton species across all stations were indicators of moderate organic pollution (Kulas et al., 2021). Station 4 exhibited the highest density of both periphyton and zooplankton communities, as well as the highest species diversity index for both groups. However, the lowest populations of these organisms were recorded in spring, likely due to flood conditions and high water discharge (50&#8211;66 m&#179;/s) across all stations. The lowest Shannon diversity index values were also calculated for spring. The Shannon index for periphyton showed a strong inverse correlation with water flow (r = -0.67) and total suspended solids (TSS) (r=-0.59). The latter maybe affects light penetration, sediment abrasion, and substrate conditions (Yuli Herawati et al., 2024). The Shannon index for zooplankton showed a strong direct correlation with dissolved oxygen concentration (r = 0.5) and nitrate concentration (r = 0.53), and a strong inverse correlation with total phosphorus (r = -0.59). This may be influenced by the positive correlation (r=0.55) between phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity indices in the basin. In spring, floodwaters and wastewater inflows increased total phosphorus concentrations across all stations compared to colder seasons, while total nitrogen concentrations decreased in warmer seasons. This imbalance in the nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio with high discharge and suspended solids, likely reduced light penetration resulting in lower diversity and density of periphyton, phytoplankton, and subsequently zooplankton (Liu et al., 2023). The saprobic index for periphyton showed a moderate direct correlation with BOD₅ (r = 0.45). Higher BOD₅ levels in winter, along with elevated saprobic index values, suggest increased organic pollution, altered nutrient cycles, and higher trophic levels (Sulastri et al., 2021). The Diatom Trophic Index (TDI), indicated eutrophic conditions with clear nutrient loading in autumn and winter, and mesotrophic to eutrophic conditions with moderate to critical nutrient loading in spring and summer.The dominance and species richness of Bacillariophyta (diatoms) in most stations (2&#8211;5) suggest favorable conditions for their high density compared to other microalgae like Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta. Diatoms thrive in cold temperatures and turbid waters with high suspended solids, and their ability to attach to substrates and form biofilms helps them resist being washed away in high-flow environments (Yoo et al., 2025). The Khersan River basin represents a system with moderate to high nutrient loading. However, due to physical constraints such as strong water flow, turbidity, and high suspended solids, this nutrient richness does not translate into high biomass. Bacillariophyta dominate not by sheer density but through resilience and competitive advantage under harsh and variable conditions. Upstream activities, flow changes due to dam construction, and gradual inflow of runoff and organic pollutants may soon disrupt the relative balance of biological species distribution. This study is the first of its kind in this watershed, and future monitoring at shorter intervals is essential to assess nutrient loading and trophic status.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
We sincerely express our gratitude to the Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute for its support, which provided the scientific and laboratory framework for this study. This research was derived from the project entitled &#8220;Investigation of the abundance and biodiversity of plankton and periphyton communities in the sub‑basin rivers of Khersan 3 Dam&#8221; with the approved code14-76-12-114-02049-021030.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>33</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>48</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/52025/08/262025/10/10
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/18
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/302026/04/302026/04/30
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1405/2/10
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>رحیمه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>رحمتی</Family>
				<NameE>Rahimeh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rahmati</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>rahmati764@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>آسیه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>مخلوق</Family>
				<NameE>Asieh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Makhlough</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>asieh_makhlough@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>نرگس</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>عالیشاه</Family>
				<NameE>Narges</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Alishah</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>n.alishah69@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>حسن</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>نصراله زاده ساروی</Family>
				<NameE>Hasan</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nasrolahzadeh Saravi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hnsaravi@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>حسن</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>فضلی</Family>
				<NameE>Hasan</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fazli</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>fazlihasan@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>بهزاد</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>رهنما</Family>
				<NameE>Behzad</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rahnama</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>rahnama.behzad@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>احد</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>احمدنژاد چهره</Family>
				<NameE>Ahad</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ahmadnejad Chehreh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Ahmadi.ahad@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>محمد</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>کاردر رستمی</Family>
				<NameE>Mohammad</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kardar Rostami</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>MohammadKardarrostami@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Khersan River</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>water quality</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Periphyton</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Zooplankton</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Biological Indecies</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>رودخانه خرسان</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>کیفیت آب</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>پریفیتون</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>زئوپلانکتون</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>شاخص زیستی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>APHA (American Public Health Association)., 2017. Standard method for examination of water and wastewater. 18th edition. American Public Health Association Publisher, Washington, USA. 1113 P.##Azevedo, D.J.S., Barbosa, J.E.L., Gomes, W.I.A., Porto, D.E., Marques, J.C. and Moiozzi, J., 2015. Diversity measures in macroinvertebrate and zooplankton communities related to the trophic status of subtropical reservoirs: Contradictory or complementary responses. Ecological Indicators, 135–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.010##Boltovskoy, D., 2000. South Atlantic zooplankton. Backhuys Publisher, Netherlands. 1706 P.##Cadjo, S., Miletic, A. and Djurkovic, A., 2007. Zooplankton of the Potpec reservoir and the saprobiological analysis of water quality. Desalination, 213 :24–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.066##Caroni, R., Bund, W.V.D., Clarke, R.T. and Johnson, R.K., 2013. Combination of multiple biological quality elements into waterbody assessment of surface waters. Hydrobiologia, 704(1): 437–451. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1274-y##Cui, Z., Fan, W., Chen, Ch., Mo, K., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q. and He, R., 2024. Ecosystem health evaluation of urban rivers based on multitrophic aquatic organisms. Journal of Environmental Management, 349: 119476. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119476##Department of Environment of Iran., 2016. Water Quality Standards of Iran. Deputy for Human Environment, Office of Water and Soil, Iran. 14 P. (In Persian)##Dorigo, U., Berard, A., Rimet, F., Bouchez, A. and Montuelle, B., 2010. In situ assessment of periphyton recovery in a river contaminated by pesticides. Aquatic Toxicology, 396–406. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.003##Habit, R.N. and Pankow, H., 1976. Algenflora der Ostsee II, Plankton. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena University Rostock Publication, Germany. 493P.##Hartley, B.H.G., Barber, J.R.C. and Sims, P., 1996. An Atlas of British Diatoms. Biopress Limited, Bristol, UK. 601P.##Hering, D., Carvalho, L., Argillier, C., Beklioglu, M., Borja, A., Cardoso, A.C. and Hanganu, J., 2015. Managing aquatic ecosystems and water resource under multiple stress: An introduction to the MARS project. Science of the Total Environment, 503: 10–21.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.106##Ekpo, I., 2013. Effect of physico-chemical parameters on zooplankton species and density of a tropical rainforest river in Niger Delta, using canonical cluster analysis. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 2(4): 13–21.##Gilvear, D.J., Heal, K.V. and Stephen, A., 2002. Hydrology and the ecological quality of Scottish river ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 294(1): 131–159. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00060-8##Kelly, M.G. and Whitton, B.A., 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: A new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7: 433–444. DOI: 10.1007/BF00003802##Kulas, A., Gulin, V., Matoničkin Kepčija, R., Zutini, C., Serti, M., Orli, S., Kajan, K., Lentendu, G., Canjevac, I., Matini, I. and Gligora, M., 2021. Ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) as bioindicators of environmental pressure: A Karstic river case. Ecological Indicators, 124: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107430##Kuticova, L.A., 1970. Rotatoria. Leningrad, Moscow. 744 P. (in Russian)##Li, L., Zheng, B. and Liu, L., 2010. Biomonitoring and bioindicators used for river ecosystems: Definitions, approaches and trends. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2: 1510–1524. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.164.##Li, Y.D., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Yao, L., Pan, X. and Jong-Lee, D., 2017. Pollution tolerant protozoa in polluted wetland. Bioresource Technology. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.051##Liu, X., Deng, J., Li, Y., Jeppesen, E., Zhang, M. and Chen, F., 2023. Nitrogen reduction causes shifts in winter and spring phytoplankton composition and resource use efficiency in a large subtropical lake in China. Ecosystems, 26: 1640–1655. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-023-00886-4##Manolova, E.Q., 1964. Cladocera. Leningrad, Moscow. 326 P. (In Russian)##Makhloogh, A., Naderi Jelodar, M., Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H., Afraei Bandpei, M.A., Roohi, A., Safari, R., Keihan, A.R., Eslami, F., Ahmadnejad Chehreh, A., Davoudi Limouni, A., Safavi, S.E., Nabavi, Z., Rezaei, M., Khodaparast, N. and Ebrahimzadeh, M., 2023.Study of phytoplankton and periphyton in the headwaters of Qeshlaq and Gaveh Rud (Sanandaj–Kurdistan) to evaluate water quality and trophic level of the ecosystem.Final report of research and consulting services for quality monitoring studies of the Zhaveh reservoir dam, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran. 100 P. (In Persian)##Malvandi, H., Moghanizadeh, R. and Abdoli, A., 2021. The use of biological indices and diversity indices to evaluate water quality of rivers in Mashhad, Iran. Biologia, 76: 959–971. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-020-00618-4 (In Persian).##Mason, C.F., 1982. Biology of freshwater pollution. Longman, London. 250 P.##Oertel, N. and Salanki, J., 2003. Biomonitoring and bioindicators in aquatic ecosystems. In: Ambasht, R.S. and Ambasht, N.K. (eds.), Modern Trends in Applied Aquatic Ecology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing, New York. pp 219–246. ##Rahmati, R., Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H., Naderi Jelodar, M., Safari, R., Afraei Bandpei, M.A., Rowshantabari, M., Khodaparast, N., Makhlough, A., Roohi, A., Rezaei, M., Ahmadnejad Chehreh, A., Ebrahimzadeh, M. and Gashtasbi, R., 2023. Assessment of water quality in the Sirvan River (Kurdistan) with emphasis on zooplanktonic biological indices for the construction of the Zhaveh reservoir dam.Scientific technical report, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Accession No. 63788. (In Persian)##Pantle, R. and Buck, H., 1955. Die biologische Überwachung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas Wasserfach, 96: 604.##Papadimitriou, C.A., Papatheodoulou, A., Takavakoglou, V., Zdragas, A., Samaras, P., Sakellaropoulos, G.P., Lazaridou, M. and Zalidis, G., 2010. Investigation of protozoa as indicators of wastewater efficiency in constructed wetlands. Desalination, 250: 378–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.018##Postel, L., Fock, H. and Hagen, W., 2000. Biomass and abundance. In: Harris, R., Wiebe, P., Lenz, J., Skjoldal, H.R. and Huntley, M. (eds.), Zooplankton Methodology Manual. Academic publishing, San Diego. pp 83–192. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012327645-2/50005-0##Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W., 1949. Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, USA. 117 P.##Sladecek, V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Schweizerbart Science Publishers, 218 P. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-510-47005-1##Sulastri,A., Khabib, T.P., Nurul, L., Miftahul, K.K., Muhammad, M., 2021. Epiphytic microalgae community as aquatic bioindicator in Brantas river, East Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 22(7):2961-2971. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220749##Tiffany, H. and Britton, M.E., 1971. The Algae of Illinois.Hafner Publishing Company, New York, USA. 447 P.##Wehr, J.D., Sheath, R.G. and Kociolek, P., 2015. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification. Academic Press, USA. 1067 P.##Wetzel, R.G. and Likens, G.E., 1991. Limnological Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. 391 P.##Yoo, H., Ji, C.W. and Kwak, I.S., 2025. Long-term analysis of Bacillariophyta assemblages in Korean estuaries: Effects of salinity gradients and environmental factors (2008–2019). Hydrobiologia, 853: 395-411. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-025-05937-8##Yousef, E.A., El-Mallah, A.M., Abdel-Baki, A.S., Al-Quraishy, S., Reyad, A. and Abdel-Tawab, H., 2024. Effect of Environmental variables on Zooplankton in various habitats of the Nile river. Water,16(7): 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/w16070915  ##Yuli Herawati, E., Sudaryanti, S., Nova Wiratno, E., Lestariaji, C. and Setyawan Anjasmara, A., 2024. Correlation of epilithic periphyton with physical chemical parameters in downstream of Welang River, Pasuruan, East Java. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(10): 2933–2947.DOI: 10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1857##Zhang, W., et al., 2019. Determination of vertical and horizontal assemblage drivers of bacterial community in a heavily polluted urban river. Water Research, 161: 98–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.107##Zhu, X., et al., 2022. Effects of different types of anthropogenic disturbances and natural wetlands on water quality and microbial communities in a typical black-odor river. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108613. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108613## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ اثر مکمل نمک‌‌های صفراوی بر عملکرد رشد، تغذیه و برخی شاخص‌های بیوشیمیایی پلاسما در ماهی باس دریایی آسیایی جوان (Lates calcarifer)</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Effect of bile salt supplementation on growth performance, feed efficiency and some plasma biochemical indices in Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer) juveniles</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>مطالعه&#8204;ای به مدت 120 روز جهت ارزیابی اثرات مکمل نمک&#8204;های صفراوی بر عملکرد رشد، ضریب تبدیل غذایی و برخی از شاخص&#8204;&#8204;های فیزیولوژی ماهی باس دریایی (Lates calcarifer) با متوسط وزن اولیه 5/0&#177;182 گرم انجام شد. به جیره پایه (پروتئین 44 درصد و چربی 15 درصد) غلظت&#8204;های صفر (کنترل)، (BA400)400، (BA800 )800، ( BA1200) 1200و (BA1600) 1600 میلی&#8204;&#8204;گرم بر کیلوگرم مکمل نمک&#8204;های صفراوی (رونئون، 30 درصد) اضافه شد. 255 عدد ماهی در 15 عدد مخزن پلی اتیلنی 1000 لیتری استوانه ای ذخیره سازی شدند و به مدت 120 روز با جیره های آزمایشی تا حد سیری (2 درصد وزن بدن)، تغذیه شدند. ماهیان در تیمار BA800 دارای وزن نهایی بیشتری نسبت به گروه های کنترل و BA400 بودند (05/0p&#60;). آنزیم&#8204;های سرمی آلانین و آسپارتات آمینو ترانسفراز در تیمار BA800 در مقایسه با سایر تیمار، به طور معنی&#8204;داری کمتر بودند (05/0p&#60;). سطح گلوکز سرم در تیمار BA400 و BA1600 به&#8204;ترتیب دارای کمترین (1/84 میلی&#8204;گرم در میلی&#8204;لیتر) و بیشترین (1/243 میلی&#8204;گرم در میلی&#8204;لیتر) سطوح بودند. میزان لایزوزیم سرم در تیمار BA800 بیشتر از گروه&#8204;&#8204;های کنترل، BA1200 و BA1600 بود (05/0p&#60;). بر اساس نتایج حاصله در مطالعه حاضر، افزودن 800 میلی&#8204;گرم نمک&#8204;های صفراوی بر کیلوگرم جیره غذایی نه&#8204;تنها سبب افزایش رشد و بهبود ضریب تبدیل غذایی بلکه سبب بهبود شاخص&#8204;های فیزیولوژی در ماهی باس دریایی آسیایی گردید.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction
The Asian sea bass, Lates calcarifer, is a carnivorous and marketable fish, with economic value in sea cages in the Persian Gulf and the Makran Sea. The culture yield of this species in the country by 2022 was about 6000 tons, and its production rate in the world is more than 120,000 tons (FAO, 2024; Mozanzadeh et al., 2022). The best levels of protein and fat in the diet for feeding the fattening stage of this species are 45-48 and 12-15 percent, respectively (Williams et al., 2003). Currently, one of the strategies for preventing and treating fatty liver in fish is mainly based on feed additives, including bile acids (Romano et al., 2020). Bile acids are defined as sterol compounds with hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties (Romano et al., 2020), playing an important role in the digestion and absorption of dietary fats by helping to suspend fats in the digestive tract and increasing the activity of bile salt-activated lipase (Romano et al., 2020). Accordingly, a feeding trial was designed to investigate the potential of using bile acids (supplemented with Runeon 1) in formulated diets of juvenile Asian sea bass and the effect on growth performance and feed efficiency.
Methodology
A 120-day study was conducted to investigate the effects of bile salt supplementation on growth performance, feed conversion ratio and some health indices of L. calcarifer with an average initial weight of 182&#177;0.5 g. The basal diet (44% protein and 15% fat) was supplemented with bile salt supplements (Ronion 1, 30% purity) at concentrations of zero (control), 400 (BA400), 800 (BA800), 1200 (BA1200) and 1600 (BA1600) mg/kg. Two hundred and twenty-five fish were stored in 15 1000-liter cylindrical polyethylene tanks (15 fish per tank) and fed the experimental diets to satiety for 120 days. The average water temperature during the period was 30.5&#177;1.2&#176;C and the water salinity was 46&#177;0.2 g/L. Growth parameters, including final weight, weight gain, specific growth rate and feed conversion ratio were determined. In addition, serum biochemical and immunological factors also were evaluated.
Results
Fish in the BA800 treatment had higher final weight, body weight gain percentage and specific growth rate than the control and BA400 groups (p&#60;0.05, Table 1), but there was no significant difference with the BA1200 and BA1600 treatments. Feed conversion ratio in the BA800 and BA1200 treatments were lower than the other treatments. Liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were significantly lower in the BA800 treatment compared to the other treatments (p&#60;0.05). Serum glucose levels in the BA400 and BA1600 treatments had the lowest and highest levels, respectively, and the other groups had intermediate numbers. Serum lysozyme levels in the BA800 treatment were higher than those in the control, BA1200, and BA1600 groups, but were not significantly different from those in the BA400 treatment (p&#60;0.05). There was no significant difference in serum complement activity levels among the experimental treatments. Antiprotease activity levels in the bile acid-fed treatments were significantly higher than those in the control group. 
Discussion and conclusion
The use of bile acid supplements in formulated diets has improved the growth of many farmed aquatic species (Wang et al., 2023). The results of the present study showed that adding 800 mg/kg of bile salts to the diet of Asian sea bass increased growth by improving feed conversion ratio in this species. Appropriate levels of bile acids increase the digestibility and absorption of fats by increasing the efficiency of nutrient absorption and activating digestive enzymes, especially lipases in the intestine, and by improving the efficiency of the diet, they lead to increased growth in aquatic animals (Romano et al., 2020). However, excessive and inappropriate levels of bile acids may have toxic effects on cells and lead to reduced growth and feed conversion ratio, and the level of this level varies depending on the type of farmed species (Romano et al., 2020). This supplement also has positive effects on liver health by reducing liver enzyme levels and improving non-specific immunity by increasing serum lysozyme and antitrypsin activity. However, adding high levels of bile acids (1600 mg/kg) to the diet will reduce growth, feed conversion ratio, and increase liver enzymes and serum glucose. Based on the results obtained in this study, adding 800 mg of bile salts per kilogram of diet increased growth, decreased serum liver enzymes, and increased serum lysozyme and antitrypsin enzyme activity levels.
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Acknowledgements
The authors of this article would like to thank and appreciate the efforts of Mr. Moghaddis Zadeh and Mr. Pazhand from the Bandar Imam Khomeini Marine Fish Research Station for maintaining the fish.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>49</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>59</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/52025/08/262025/10/102025/11/22
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/1
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/04/30
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1405/2/10
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>منصور</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>طرفی موزان زاده</Family>
				<NameE>Mansour</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Torfi Mozanzadeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mansour.torfi@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>سمیرا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>ناظم رعایا</Family>
				<NameE>Samira</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nazemroaya</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>samira.nazemroaya@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>فاطمه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>حکمت پور</Family>
				<NameE>Fatemeh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hekmatpour</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hekmatpourf@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>علیرضا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>قائدی</Family>
				<NameE>Alireza</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ghaedi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی و شیلات، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان چهارمحال و بختیـاری، سـازمان تحقیقـات، آمـوزش و تـرو یج،کشـاورزی، شهرکرد، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>aliangler@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>رضا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>کاظم پور</Family>
				<NameE>Reza</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kazempour</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشکده دامپزشکی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>kazempour@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>لفته</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>محسنی نژاد</Family>
				<NameE>Lefteh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mohseninejad</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>lmohseni1@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>حسین</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>هوشمند</Family>
				<NameE>Hossein</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Houshmand</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>houshmand.hossein@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>مجتبی</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>ذبایح نجف آبادی</Family>
				<NameE>Mojtaba</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zabayeh Najafabadi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>zabayeh2005@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>حمید</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>سقاوی</Family>
				<NameE>Hamid</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Saghavi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Saghavih@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>محمد</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>یونس زاده فشالمی</Family>
				<NameE>Mohammad</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Youneszadeh Feshalami</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>m_yooneszadeh@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>مینا</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>آهنگر زاده</Family>
				<NameE>Mina</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ahangarzadeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>m.ahangarzadeh@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>عبدالرحیم</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>اصولی</Family>
				<NameE>Abdolrahim</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Oosooli</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>rahimoosooli@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>راضیه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>عناناتی</Family>
				<NameE>Razieh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ananati</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Razieh-Ananati@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>مصطفی</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>صادقی پناه</Family>
				<NameE>Mostafa</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sadeghi Panah</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Sadeghipanah@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>شاپور</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>مهرجویان</Family>
				<NameE>Shapour</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mehrjooyan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>پژوهشکده آبزی‌‌پروری جنوب کشور، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Mehrjoo.Shapour@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Bile acids</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>growth performance</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>feed efficiency</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>health indicators</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Asian sea bass</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>اسیدصفراوی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>کارایی رشد</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>بازده تغذیه</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>شاخص های سلامت</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>باس دریایی آسیایی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Abdel‑Tawwab, M., Abdel‑Latif, H.M.R., El Basuini, M.F., El‑Nokrashy, A.M., Khaled, A.A., Kord, M., Soliman, A.A., Zaki, M., Nour, A.-E., Labib, E.-M. H. and Khalil, H.S. 2023. Effects of exogenous bile acids (BAs) on growth, lipid profile, digestive enzymes, and immune responses of thinlip mullet, Liza ramada. Scientific Reports, 13:22875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49788-6##Ellis, A.E., 1990. Serum antiproteases in fish and lysozyme assays. In: Stolen, J.S., Fletcher, T.C., Anderson, D.P., Roberson, B.S., Van Muiswinkel, W.B. (Eds.), Techniques in Fish Immunology. SOS Publications, Fair Haven, NJ, pp. 95–103.##FAO, 2024. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 (Sustainability in Action). Rome, Italy.##Hekmatpoor, F., Ghaedi, A., Yooneszadeh Fashalami, M., Nazem Roaya, S., Mozanzadeh, M.T. and Mousavi-Sabet, H., 2025. Effects of different levels of bile acid supplementation in a high-fat diet on growth, lipid metabolism, carcass composition, and gastrointestinal function in Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) fingerlings. Journal of Fisheries, 78, 216-229. DOI: 10.22059/jfisheries.2025.394178.1458.##Hoseini, S.A., Ghaedi, A., Mahmoudi, R. and Sharifian, M., 2024. Effect of different dietary bile acid supplementation (Runeon 1) levels on growth, performance, carcass composition, and serum biochemical factors in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 33, 143-157. . DOI: 10.22092/ISFJ.2024.132601. [In Persian]##Iwashita, Y., Suzuki, N., Matsunari, H., Sugita, T. and Yamamoto, T. 2009. Influence of soya saponin, soya lectin, and cholyltaurine supplemented to a casein-based semipurified diet on intestinal morphology and biliary bile status in fingerling rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fisheries Science 75 (5), 1307–1315. DOI: 10.1007/s12562-009-0158-1##Iwashita, Y., Suzuki, N., Yamamoto, T., Shibata, J.I., Isokawa, K., Soon, A.H. and Goto, T. 2008. Supplemental effect of cholyltaurine and soybean lecithin to a soybean meal-based fish meal-free diet on hepatic and intestinal morphology of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fisheries Sciences 74 (5), 1083–1095. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01628.x##Jin, M., Pan, T., Cheng, X., Zhu, T.T., Sun, P., Zhou, F. and Zhou, Q., 2019. Effects of supplemental dietary l-carnitine and bile acids on growth performance, antioxidant and immune ability, histopathological changes and inflammatory response in juvenile black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii) fed high-fat diet. Aquaculture, 504, 199-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.063##Jing, Y., Kai, L., Mai, K. and Ai, Q. 2017. Dietary lipid levels affect lipoprotein clearance, fatty acid transport, lipogenesis and lipolysis at the transcriptional level in muscle and adipose tissue of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Aquaculture Research 48. DOI: 10.1111/are.13219. ##Kortner, T.M., Penn, M.H., Bjorkhem, I., Masøval, K. and Krogdahl, A. 2016. Bile components and lecithin supplemented to plant based diets do not diminish diet related intestinal inflammation in Atlantic salmon. BMC Veterinary Research 12: 190. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0819-0##Li, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., and Jiang, K. 2008. Influence of several non-nutrient additives on nonspecific immunity and growth of juvenile turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L. Aquaculture Nutrition, 14(5), 387–395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00539.x##Lei, W., Li, J., Fang, P., Wu, S., Deng, Y., Luo, A., He, Z., and Peng, M., 2023. Effects of dietary bile acids on growth performance, lipid deposition, and intestinal health of rice field eel (Monopterus albus) fed with high-lipid diets. Aquaculture Nutrition, DOI: 10.1155/2023/3321734##Leiro, J., Arranz, J.A., Iglesias, R., Ubeira, F.M. and SanMartın, M.L. 2004. Effects of the histiophagous ciliate Philasterides dicentrarchi on turbot phagocyte responses. Fish and shellfish immunology, 17, 27-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2003.11.003##Li, Y., Wang, S., Hu, Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, X., Cheng, P. and Cui, Z., 2021. Dietary bile acid supplementation reveals beneficial effects on intestinal healthy status of tongue sole (Cynoglossus semiliaevis). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 116, 52–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.06.020. ##Li, J., Wang, Z., Cao, X., Wang, J., Gong, Y., Wang, X., Lai, W., Bu, X., Zheng, J., Mai, K. and Ai, Q. 2023. Effects of supplemental mixed bile acids on growth performance, body composition, digestive enzyme activities, skin color, and flesh quality of juvenile large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) in soybean oil based diet. Frontiers in Marine Science 10:1149887. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1149887##Liu, Y., He, G., Wang, Q., Mai, K., Xu, W. and Zhou, H., 2014. Hydroxyproline supplementation on the performances of high plant protein source-based diets in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Aquaculture, 433, 476-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.002##Mohammadian, T., Alishahi, M., Tabandeh, M.R., Ghorbanpoor, M. and Gharibi, D. 2018. Changes in immunity, expression of some immune-related genes of Shabot fish, Tor grypus, following experimental infection with Aeromonas hydrophila: Effects of autochthonous probiotics. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 10, 616–628. DOI:10.1007/s12602-017-9373-8##Marzouk, Y., Zaki, M.A., Nour, A.-E.M., Mehrim, A.I. and Khalil, H.S. 2025. Impacts of commercial bile acids on growth performance, immune responses and expression genes of lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia fingerlings Oreochromis niloticus. Scientific Reports, 15, 20223. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-06813-0##Mozanzadeh, M.T., Mohammadian, T., Ahangarzadeh, M., Houshmand, H., Sepahdari, A., Najafabadi, M.Z., Oosooli, A.R., Saghavi, H., Monem, J., Mehrjooyan, S., Hafezieh, M., Mirbakhsh, M., Osroush, A. and Seyedi, M., 2022. Effects of probiotic mixtures in the diet on growth performance, hematological indices, immunity and antioxidant capacity of Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer) juveniles. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 31. 1-12. (DOI): 10.22092/ISFJ.2023.128303[In Persian]##Romano, N., Kumar, V., Yang, G., Kajbaf, K., Rubio, M.B., Overturf, K. and Hardy, R. 2020. Bile acid metabolism in fish: disturbances caused by fishmeal alternatives and some mitigating effects from dietary bile inclusions. Reviews in Aquaculture 12, 1792–1817. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12410##Sun, J., Wang, J., Ma, J., Li, B., Hao, T., Sun, Y., and Zhang, L., 2014. Effects of dietary bile acids on growth, body composition and lipid metabolism of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) at different lipid levels. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 45, 617–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.06.032. ##Wang, T., Yan, J., Xu, W., Ai, Q. and Mai, K., 2016. Characterization of Cyclooxygenase-2 and its induction pathways in response to high lipid diet-induced inflammation in Larmichthys crocea. Scientific Reports 6, 19921. DOI: 10.1038/srep19921##Wang, L., Sagada, G., Wang C., Liu, R., Li, Q., Zhang, C., Yan, Y., 2022. Exogenous bile acids regulate energy metabolism and improve the health condition of farmed fish. Aquaculture, 562, 738852. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738852.##Wang S, Zhang W, Cao A, Pan Z and Liu T 2022. Dietary Supplementation of Bile Acids in Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis): A Promising Strategy to Improve Hepatic Health Status. Frontiers in Marine Sciences, 9:899768. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.899768##Williams, KC., Barlow, C.G., Rodgers, L., Hockings, I., Agcopra, C. and Ruscoe, I. 2003. Asian seabass Lates calcarifer perform well when fed pelleted diets high in protein and lipid. Aquaculture 225, 191–206. DOI:10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00278-3.##Xia, R., Zhang, Q., Xia, D., Hao, Q., Ding, Q., Ran, C., Yang, Y., Cao, A., Zhang, Z. and Zhou, Z., 2023. The direct and gut microbiota-mediated effects of dietary bile acids on the improvement of gut barriers in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Animal Nutrition, 14, 32-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.03.008.##Yamamoto, T., Suzuki, N., Furuita, H., Sugita, T., Tanaka, N. and Goto, T. 2007. Supplemental effect of bile salts to soybean meal-based diet on growth and feed utilization of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fisheries Sciences 73 (1), 123–131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2007.01310.x##Yu, H., Zhang, L., Chen, P., Liang, X., Cao, A., Han, J. and Xue, M. 2019. Dietary bile acids enhance growth, and alleviate hepatic fibrosis induced by a high starch diet via AKT/ FOXO1 and cAMP/AMPK/SREBP1 pathway in Micropterus salmoides. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1430. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01430##Zheng, Z., Zeng, B., and Xiang X., 2016. Effects of bile acid supplemental level on growth performance, physical indices and body composition of juvenile Schizothorax prenanti. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 28(8), 2423 –2430.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ اثر پروبیوتیک تک‌سل پلاس بر فراوانی باکتری‌های جنس Vibrioدر استخرهای پرورش مولدین میگو سفید غربی (Litopenaeus vannamei)</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Effect of Tek Cell Plus probiotic on the abundance of Vibrio genus bacteria in western white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) broodstock rearing ponds</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>در حال حاضر، بیماری&#8204;&#8204;های فراوانی پرورش میگوی سراسر جهان را تحت تاثیر قرار داده&#8204;&#8204;اند. عوامل عفونی باکتریایی مهم&#8204;&#8204;ترین معضل بهداشتی میگوی پرورشی هستند. یک جایگزین مناسب برای عوامل ضد میکروبی شیمیایی برای جلوگیری از بیماری در آبزی پروری میگو، استفاده از پروبیوتیک&#8204;&#8204;هاست. به طور کلی، بیماری&#8204;&#8204;های ناشی ازVibrio spp. ، علت اصلی مرگ&#8204;ومیر در هچری&#8204;&#8204;های میگو به&#8204;ویژه در مراحل اولیه لاروی است. در بررسی حاضر، نمونه&#8204; آب مورد مطالعه از 3 استخر مزارع مولدسازی در شهرستان کنارک از عمق 30 سانتی&#8204;متری از سطح آب به &#8204;صورت تصادفی برداشت شد. اطلاعات مدیریتی مزرعه پرورش میگو (نحوه مدیریت آب و غذادهی) و برخی شاخص&#8204;های کیفی آب (شوری، pH و درجه حرارت آب)، اندازه&#8204;گیری و ثبت &#8206;گردید. در آزمایشگاه نمونه&#8204;ها همگن شده و کشت باکتریایی در محیط کشت&#8204;های MYP، TSA و TCBS در سه تکرار به &#8204;منظور جداسازی اولیه Vibrio &#160;غالب از آب استخر انجام شد. نتایج شمارش کل باکتری&#8204;&#8204;های جنس Vibrio نشان داد که پس از افزودن پروبیوتیک به آب استخرها، رشد باکتری&#8204;&#8204;های Vibrio شناسایی شده، نسبت به کنترل مثبت (تعداد باکتری&#8204;&#8204;های Vibrio قبل از افزودن پروبیوتیک)، به طور معنی&#8204;داری کاهش یافت. تعداد کل باکتری جنس Vibrio و تعداد کل باکتری هتروترف در سه استخر شماره 1، 2 و 3 قبل از افزودن پروبیوتیک به&#8204;ترتیب اعداد 102&#215;2/3، 102&#215;3/4 و 108&#215;5 واحد کلنی بر میلی&#8204;لیتر و بعد از افزودن پروبیوتیک به&#8204;ترتیب اعداد&#160; 102&#215;3 ، 102&#215;3/1 و 102&#215;4 واحد کلنی بر میلی&#8204;لیتر نشان داد. نتایج حاصل از تعیین توانایی بازدارندگی رشد به روش انتشار از طریق چاهک بیشترین و کمترین اثر بازدارندگی محصول تجاری پروبیوتک و استفاده از سوسپانسیون آماده شده (C1) به&#8204;ترتیب در A1-MYP (5/7 میلی&#8204;متر) و V.p-TSA (3/6 میلی&#8204;متر) مشاهده شد و در باکتری خالص شده از محصول تجاری پروبیوتیک در محیط کشت اختصاصی (C2) بیشترین و کمترین اثر بازدارندگی مربوط به A1-MYP (5/8 میلی&#8204;متر) و B2-MYP (6 میلی&#8204;متر) مشاهده گردید. بیشترین فعالیت مهار کنندگی پروبیوتیک در تست چاهک گذاری علیه A1 و V.P مشاهده شد. نتایج نشان داد پروبیوتیک تک سل پلاس دارای خاصیت آنتی&#8204;&#8204;باکتریال در برابر Vibrio غالب جداسازی شده از استخر و Vibrio parahaemolyticus بود.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction
Aquaculture, as one of the most important sources of animal protein, plays an increasingly significant role in global food security, and its importance has grown further due to the depletion of natural stocks and the rising demand for seafood (Madhana et al., 2021). In this context, shrimp farming has expanded rapidly, particularly in tropical countries, and has become a key sector of aquaculture production (HAU and Haryana, 2022). The Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei is considered one of the most important cultured species due to its fast growth, high survival rate, relative resistance to diseases, and tolerance to a wide range of salinities, making it especially suitable for the environmental conditions of southern Iran (Chong‑Robles et al., 2014; Laramore et al., 2001). Despite advances in management practices, bacterial diseases remain among the main challenges faced by shrimp farms, with vibriosis caused by Vibrio spp. being a major contributor to mortality and economic losses (Muthu et al., 2024). Vibrios are Gram‑negative pathogenic bacteria that not only cause diseases in aquatic animals but can also lead to foodborne infections in humans (Bintsis, 2017). The excessive use of antibiotics to control these diseases has resulted in the emergence of antibiotic‑resistant bacteria and disruption of the microbial balance in aquaculture environments (Kesarcodi‑Watson et al., 2008). In this regard, environmentally friendly and preventive approaches, such as the use of probiotics as suitable alternatives to antibiotics, have gained increasing attention (Defoirdt et al., 2011; Proespraiwong et al., 2023). Probiotics contribute to disease reduction and improved survival by enhancing water quality, strengthening host immunity, and competing with pathogenic bacteria, particularly Vibrio spp. (Lahay et al., 2023; Verschuere et al., 2000). The efficacy of these compounds is commonly evaluated through in vitro antagonism assays (Kesarcodi‑Watson et al., 2008).The native probiotic &#8220;Tek Cell Plus,&#8221; which was isolated from shrimp farms in Bushehr Province and has reached industrial-scale production following global registration and extensive testing (Ghaednia et al., 2024; Mahjoub et al., 2019), was evaluated in the present study for its ability to reduce the bacterial load of vibrios in the pond water of Pacific white shrimp broodstock culture systems, as well as for its inhibitory effects on vibrio growth under laboratory conditions.
Methodology 
Aqueous samples were procured from three discrete broodstock production ponds in the Konarak district utilizing stratified random sampling techniques at a standardized depth of 30 cm below the water surface interface. Comprehensive aquaculture management parameters were documented, including water quality management protocols, nutritional regimes, and physicochemical variables (salinity, pH, and thermal gradient). Laboratory analyses incorporated sample homogenization followed by selective and differential microbiological cultivation on MYP, TSA, and TCBS media, with triplicate inoculations to ensure statistical validity. The antagonistic properties of the commercial probiotic against indigenous Vibrio isolates were evaluated through quantitative inhibition zone assays using the agar well diffusion methodology. Positive controls consisted of pre-intervention Vibrio population densities, allowing for comparative efficacy assessment.
Result 
Microbiological enumeration demonstrated a statistically significant reduction (p&#60;0.05) in Vibrio spp. population densities following probiotic application across all experimental units. Specifically, Total Vibrio Count (TVC) and Total Heterotrophic Bacteria (THB) in ponds 1, 2, and 3 exhibited pre-intervention values of 3.2&#215;10&#178;, 4.3&#215;10&#178;, and 5&#215;10⁸ CFU/mL, respectively. Post-application analyses revealed substantial reductions to 3&#215;10&#178;, 1.3&#215;10&#178;, and 4&#215;10&#178; CFU/mL, respectively, indicating a logarithmic decrease in bacterial load, particularly in pond 3. In vitro antagonism assays utilizing the well diffusion technique revealed differential inhibitory capacities. The commercial probiotic suspension (C1) demonstrated maximum and minimum inhibition growth zones against A1-MYP (7.5&#177;0.2 mm) and V.p-TSA (6.3&#177;0.1 mm), respectively. When utilizing purified bacterial isolates from the commercial probiotic (C2), enhanced inhibitory efficacy was observed, with maximum and minimum zones of inhibition registered against A1-MYP (8.5&#177;0.2 mm) and B2-MYP (6.0&#177;0.1 mm), respectively. The most pronounced antimicrobial activity was consistently observed against the A1 isolate and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, suggesting strain-specific antagonistic mechanisms.
Discussion and conclusions
The present findings demonstrate that the native probiotic Tek Cell Plus, identified as Bacillus vallismortis with the GenBank accession number JQ085958.1, significantly reduced the bacterial load of Vibrio, the dominant bacterial genus in shrimp pond water, relative to the total bacterial population. Similar probiotic effects have been reported for Bacillus cereus and Paenibacillus spp., which were evaluated at concentrations of 10⁴ and 10⁵ CFU mL⁻&#185; in post‑larval shrimp ponds. In vivo experiments revealed that these bacteria exerted strong probiotic activity against Vibrio species, resulting in a significant reduction in shrimp larval mortality. The antagonistic activity of B. cereus and Paenibacillus spp. against vibrios has been attributed to the production of bioactive compounds such as zwittermicin‑A and kanosamine (Ravi et al., 2007). These mechanisms are consistent with the outcomes of the present study, wherein the application of B. vallismortis led to a marked reduction in Vibrio abundance in pond water. Supporting evidence is provided by Temario et al. (2022), who demonstrated that dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis BF12 significantly increased survival, improved growth performance, and reduced the intestinal abundance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Penaeus monodon. Additional studies have emphasized the efficacy of Bacillus-based probiotics in L. vannamei culture systems. In a 45‑day in vivo trial, B. subtilis IPA‑S.51 and Shewanella algae IPA‑S.111 inhibited V. parahaemolyticus growth while also enhancing shrimp growth performance. Agar‑well diffusion assays further confirmed that probiotics, given sufficient contact time, can produce clear inhibition zones against pathogenic vibrios. Ramesh et al. (2014) isolated twelve Bacillus spp. strains from the gut of P. monodon, several of which showed strong inhibitory activity against V. harveyi VSH5, with inhibition zones reaching up to 19.0 &#177; 0.1 mm. These effects were attributed to pH modification, production of inhibitory metabolites, nutrient competition, and lactonase enzyme activity. Probiotic efficacy has also been demonstrated using other bacterial groups. Studies by Ravi et al. (2007) and Ferreira et al. (2015) confirmed that Bacillus spp. significantly reduced Vibrio abundance in shrimp ponds, while Thompson et al. (2022) showed that lactic acid bacteria, including Lactobacillus curvatus subsp. curvatus, L. plantarum, and Pediococcus acidolactici, inhibited several pathogenic vibrios through the release of antimicrobial compounds. Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND/EMS), primarily caused by toxigenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus, represents one of the most severe bacterial diseases in shrimp aquaculture. A meta‑analysis by Ghaednia et al. (2024) concluded that direct addition of single‑strain Bacillus-based probiotics to pond water is the most effective application method for AHPND control. The present study aligns with these findings, as water application of B. vallismortis yielded clear suppressive effects on pathogenic vibrios. Finally, bioinformatic analysis identified two Vibrio isolates closely related to Vibrio sagamiensis and Vibrio fortis, both belonging to the class Gammaproteobacteria. Previous studies have reported V. sagamiensis in tropical marine environments (Yoshizawa et al., 2010) and V. fortis as an emerging pathogen in aquatic organisms (Thompson et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2016), suggesting potential pathogenic risks in shrimp farming systems. Overall, the findings confirm the effectiveness of Bacillus vallismortis as a robust probiotic candidate for sustainable control of Vibrio-associated diseases in shrimp aquaculture.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to all those who contributed to this research through their guidance and scientific support.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>61</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>73</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/52025/08/262025/10/102025/11/222023/11/22
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1402/9/1
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/04/30
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1405/2/10
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>سولماز</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>بازدار</Family>
				<NameE>Solmaz</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Bazdar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دریایی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>bazdarsolmaz4@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>مصطفی</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>غفاری</Family>
				<NameE>Mostafa</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ghaffari</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دریایی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mgmostafaghaffari@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>اشکان</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>اژدری</Family>
				<NameE>Ashkan</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ajdari</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>مرکز تحقیقات شیلاتی آبهای دور، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، چابهار، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>a_arzhan@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>زینب</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>کرد</Family>
				<NameE>zeinab</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>kord</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>گروه شیلات، دانشکده علوم دریایی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>kord.zeynab97@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Key words: single cell plus bacteria probiotic</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Viprio Spp</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breeder</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>shrimp breeding</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Litopenaeus vannamei</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breeding pool</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>پروبیوتیک تک سل پلاس</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Vibrio</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>مولد</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>میگو</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Litopenaeus vannamei</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Basim, Y., Mohebali, G., Jorfi, S., Nabizadeh, R., Ghadiri, A., Moghadam, M. A., . . . Fard, N. J. H. (2020). Comparison of performance and efficiency of four methods to extract genomic DNA from oil contaminated soils in southwestern of Iran. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 18, 463-468. ##Chandrakala, N., &#38; Priya, S. (2017). Vibriosis in shrimp aquaculture a review. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 27-33. ##Chong-Robles, J., Charmantier, G., Boulo, V., Lizárraga-Valdéz, J., Enríquez-Paredes, L. M., &#38; Giffard-Mena, I. (2014). Osmoregulation pattern and salinity tolerance of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) during post-embryonic development. Aquaculture, 422, 267-261. ##Chythanya, R., Karunasagar, I., &#38; Karunasagar, I. (2002). Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2 strain. Aquaculture, 208(1-2), 1-10. ##Ferreira, G. S., Bolivar, N. C., Pereira, S. A., Guertler, C., do Nascimento Vieira, F., Mouriño, J. L. P., &#38; Seiffert, W. Q. (2015). Microbial biofloc as source of probiotic bacteria for the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 448, 273-279. ##Ghaednia, B., Mirbakhsh, M., &#38; Kakoolaki, S. (2024). Effects of bacterial probiotics interventions on acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimp: A meta-analysis. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 23(1), 61-83. ##Ghaednia, B., Mirbakhsh, M., Pazir, M. K., Bahmani, M., &#38; Hafezieh, M. (1403). Effect of probiotic Bacillus vallismortis IS03 on growth performance and feed efficiency in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in earthen ponds. Scientific Journal of Iranian Fisheries, 41-51. doi:10.22092/ISFJ.2024.131217##HAU, C., &#38; Haryana, H. (2022). SHRIMP CULTURE (LITOPENAEUS VANNAMEI) AND ITS MANAGEMENT. Agriculture Science, VII 62-77. ##Kesarcodi-Watson, A., Kaspar, H., Lategan, M. J., &#38; Gibson, L. (2008). Probiotics in aquaculture: the need, principles and mechanisms of action and screening processes. Aquaculture, 14-1,(1)274.##Lahay, A. F., Putriani, R. B., Reza, M., Septi Malidda, E. P., Md Afsar, A. S., Mamdoh, J., &#38; Santanumurti, B. (2023). The role of probiotics in vannamei shrimp aquaculture performance–A review. Veterinay World, 16(3), 638-649. ##Laramore, S., Laramore, C. R., &#38; Scarpa, J. (2001). Effect of low salinity on growth and survival of postlarvae and juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 32(4), 385-392. ##Madhana, S., Kanimozhi, G., &#38; Panneerselvam, A. (2021). chapter 20 - Probiotics in Shrimp Aquaculture. Microorganisms in Food and Health, 309-325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822909-5.00020-4##Mahjoub, M., Mirbakhsh, M., Afsharnasab, M., Kakoolaki, S., &#38; Hosseinzadeh, S. (2019). Inhibitory activity of native probiotic Bacillus vallismortis IS03 against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi under in vitro and in vivo conditions in Litopenaeus vannamei. Sustainable Aquaculture and Health Management Journal, 5(2), 54-66. ##McLandsborough, L. (2004). Food microbiology laboratory: CRC press.##Mohammadi Makvandi, Z., Mesbah, M., Gharibi, D., Alishahi, M., &#38; Ghorbanpour, M. (2019). Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of isolated bacteria from white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) intestine, water and sediment in Choebde, Abadan. Journal of Animal Environment, 11(1), 293-302. ##Muthu, C. M., Vickram, A., Sowndharya, B. B., Saravanan, A., Kamalesh, R., &#38; Dinakarkumar, Y. (2024). A comprehensive review on the utilization of probiotics in aquaculture towards sustainable shrimp farming. Fish &#38; Shellfish Immunology, 109459. ##Proespraiwong, P., Mavichak, R., Imaizumi, K., Hirono, I., &#38; Unajak, S. (2023). Evaluation of Bacillus spp. as Potent Probiotics with Reduction in AHPND-Related Mortality and Facilitating Growth Performance of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Farms. Microorganisms, 11(9), 2176. ##Ramesh, K., Natarajan, M., Sridhar, H., Vanitha, M. U., &#38; Umamaheswari, S. (2014). Feasibility of shrimp gut probionts with anti-vibrio and anti-QS in penaeid culture. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 1(3), 26-34. ##Rattanachuay, P., Kantachote, D., &#38; Suntinanalert, P. (2007). Selection of proteolytic bacteria with ability to inhibit Vibrio harveyi during white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultivation. biocontrol, 29(2). ##Ravi, A. V., Musthafa, K., Jegathammbal, G., Kathiresan, K., &#38; Pandian, S. (2007). Screening and evaluation of probiotics as a biocontrol agent against pathogenic Vibrios in marine aquaculture. Letters in applied microbiology, 45(2), 219-223. ##Reswiler, V. (1999). Pathogenic Microbes in Food and Epidemiology of Food Poisoning. University of Tehran Printing and Publishing Institute (9789640341384), 111.##Rezaei Toabe, K., Rafiei, G.R., (2016), Reproduction and Cultivation of Marine Shrimps, Tehran University Press, page 23.##cholerae. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 136-164. ##Thompson, F., Thompson, C., Hoste, B., Vandemeulebroecke, K., Gullian, M., &#38; Swings, J. (2003). Vibrio fortis sp. nov. and Vibrio hepatarius sp. nov., isolated from aquatic animals and the marine environment. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 53(5), 1495-1501. ##Thompson, J., Weaver, M. A., Lupatsch, I., Shields, R. J., Plummer, S., Coates, C. J., &#38; Rowley, A. F. (2022). Antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic vibrios and their potential use as probiotics in shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) culture. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 240. ##Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Qin, G., Luo, W., &#38; Lin, Q. (2016). A novel pathogenic bacteria (Vibrio fortis) causing enteritis in cultured seahorses, Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810. Journal of Fish Diseases, 39(6), 765-769. ##Yoshizawa, S., Wada, M., Yokota, A., &#38; Kogure, K. (2010). Vibrio sagamiensis sp. nov., luminous marine bacteria isolated from sea water. The Journal of general and applied microbiology, 56(6), 499-507.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>مقاله علمی – پژوهشی:‌ تأثیر افزودن پروبیوتیک تک‌سل (Bacillus subtilis) بر شاخص‌های رشد، بقاء و کیفیت آب میگوی, Boone, 1931  Litopenaeus vannamei پرورش‌یافته 
در سیستم بیوفلاک</TitleF>
		<TitleE>Effect of supplementing single cell probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) on growth performance, survival, and water quality of Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone, 1931 cultured 
in a biofloc system</TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>1</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>پرورش میگوی پا سفید غربی (Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone, 1931) نیازمند راهکارهایی برای حفظ کیفیت آب و بهبود شاخص&#8204;های رشد است. یکی از رویکردهای نوین در این زمینه، استفاده هم&#8204;زمان از فناوری بیوفلاک و مکمل زیستی مانند پروبیوتیک است. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف ارزیابی تأثیر کاربرد بیوفلاک و پروبیوتیک تک&#8204;سل بر کیفیت آب و عملکرد رشد میگوی پا سفید غربی در مزارع پرورش میگو واقع در سایت پرورش میگوی گمیشان، انجام شد. پست لاروهای مرحله 12 (PL12) با میانگین وزنی 05/0&#177;52/0 گرم با تراکم 200 هزار قطعه در هکتار در مزارع پرورش میگو ذخیره&#8204;&#8204;سازی شدند. در طول دوره پرورش، شاخص&#8204;&#8204;های فیزیکوشیمیایی (شوری، هدایت الکتریکی، دما، (pH به&#8204; صورت منظم پایش گردید. تغذیه میگوها با استفاده از خوراک تجاری کنسانتره، به میزان 4-2 وعده در روز و در محدوده 10-5/2 درصد زیست توده کل، از خرداد لغایت شهریور 1402 انجام شد. طرح آزمایشی به&#8204; صورت کاملاً تصادفی با یک گروه شاهد و سه تیمار آزمایشی، هر کدام با سه تکرار، اجرا گردید: گروه شاهد: (بدون افزودنی)، تیمار 1: (افزودن بیوفلاک و پروبیوتیک تک&#8204;&#8204;سل با غلظت 300 گرم در هکتار)؛ تیمار 2 (افزودن بیوفلاک و پروبیوتیک تک&#8204;&#8204;سل با غلظت 400 گرم در هکتار)؛&#160; تیمار 3 (افزودن بیوفلاک و پروبیوتیک تک&#8204;&#8204;سل با غلظت 500 گرم در هکتار). نتایج حاصل از تجزیه&#8204;وتحلیل آماری نشان داد که تفاوت معنی&#8204;&#8204;داری در درصد بازماندگی بین تیمارها وجود نداشت. با این&#8204;حال&#8204;، تیمار حاوی 300 گرم پروبیوتیک در هکتار، بالاترین میانگین وزن نهایی، بیشترین نرخ رشد روزانه و کمترین ضریب تبدیل غذایی را نسبت به سایر تیمارها به&#8204;ویژه تیمار شاهد و تیمار 500 گرم در هکتار (غلظت پیشنهادی کارخانه سازنده)، نشان داد. بر این اساس، به&#8204;نظر می&#8204;&#8204;رسد که استفاده از غلظت 300 گرم پروبیوتیک تک&#8204;سل در هکتار، ضمن بهبود عملکرد رشد، از نظر اقتصادی نیز مقرون به&#8204;صرفه&#8204;تر است و می&#8204;تواند به&#8204; عنوان دوز بهینه در سیستم&#8204;های پرورش میگوی پا سفید غربی، پیشنهاد شود.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Introduction 
Aquaculture now represents a primary sector in global food production, having surpassed capture fisheries in aquatic animal production as of 2022 (Abdel-Rahim et al., 2023; Caputo et al., 2023). Among the farmed species, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) has become the dominant species due to its rapid growth, omnivorous diet, high metabolic rate, and adaptability to tropical marine environments (De Silva et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2025; Fadel et al., 2025). Although this species is native to the eastern Pacific, more than 85% of its global aquaculture production now occurs in Asian countries (FAO, 2020; Amiin et al., 2023). Specifically, in Iran, more than 180,000 hectares are suitable for shrimp farming, including 4,000 hectares in Golestan Province. Nevertheless, intensive shrimp farming is confronted with ecological challenges, particularly the accumulation of nutrients and deterioration of water quality due to animal feed (Chaikaew et al., 2019). Maintaining optimal water parameters including temperature, dissolved oxygen, salinity, pH, and conductivity is critical for preventing stress and disease in shrimp culture (Kautsky et al., 2000; Kuncha et al., 2025). Biofloc technology (BFT), which stimulates the formation of beneficial microbial flocs through the addition of carbon sources, has been shown to improve productivity and promote environmental sustainability (Kumar et al., 2014; Mansour et al., 2022; Iber et al., 2025). The incorporation of probiotics into recirculating aquaculture systems further enhances water quality, gut health, and immune function (Menaga et al., 2023; Kaya, 2025). Probiotics exert their effects by competitively excluding pathogens, producing antimicrobial substances, and stimulating host immune responses (Angahar, 2016; Hoseinifar et al., 2018); certain strains also facilitate the reduction of nitrogenous waste (Dalmin et al., 2001; Mang et al., 2024). Moreover, probiotics are recognized as cost-effective, readily isolatable, and ecologically sustainable interventions (Gullian et al., 2004; Vidhya and Thomas, 2023). In larval stages, probiotics enhance digestion through enzyme secretion (Bairagi et al., 2002; Lara-Flores, 2011; Qiu et al., 2023; Vulla et al., 2024). When combined with biofloc technology (BFT), they improve growth performance, feed efficiency, disease resistance, and water quality (Dash et al., 2018; Pratiwi et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2023). This study aims to evaluate the synergistic effects of probiotics and BFT on L. vannamei with a focus on water quality improvement, enhanced survival, optimized growth, and increased pathogen resistance. The integrated approach offers a sustainable framework for efficient and environmentally friendly shrimp aquaculture.
Methodology
This study was conducted at the shrimp aquaculture site in Gomishan County, located in northern Golestan Province, Iran. Field experiments were carried out in 12 shrimp ponds to evaluate the effects of biofloc and the probiotic Tak-Cell (containing Bacillus subtilis) on the growth performance and survival of Pacific white shrimp (L. vannamei). A total of 30 kg of the probiotic was applied over a 120-day period across nine ponds, with an additional 500 g administered during the pond preparation phase. Biofloc was prepared using carbon sources such as sugarcane molasses, rice flour, and wheat flour. These substrates were incubated in warm water (40&#176;C) and subsequently diluted at a specific ratio before being introduced into the culture system. The carbon and nitrogen ratio (C: N) was optimized based on the assumption that 50% of nitrogen from feed is excreted into the aquatic environment. Post-larvae with an initial mean weight of 0.52&#177;0.12 g were stocked at a density of 200,000 individuals per hectare in aerated ponds. Throughout the culture period (June to September), water quality parameters including salinity, temperature, pH, ammonia, nitrate, and phosphate were regularly monitored. Shrimp were fed commercial formulated diets 2&#8211;4 times daily at feeding rates ranging from 2.5% to 10% of biomass. The experimental design followed a completely randomized structure with four treatments: (1) biofloc without probiotic (control), and (2&#8211;4) biofloc combined with probiotic at concentrations of 300, 400, and 500 g/ha, respectively. Each treatment was replicated three times. Growth parameters including mean body weight, average daily gain, specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and survival rate were calculated using standard formulas. Data normality was assessed via the Shapiro&#8211;Wilk test. Upon confirmation of normal distribution, one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests were conducted at a 5% significance level using SPSS version 23.
Result
During the period of shrimp farming in the test ponds, considerable fluctuations in air temperature were observed between the morning and evening hours, occasionally reaching up to 15&#176;C. However, the water temperature, salinity and pH remained relatively stable throughout the sampling period and were consistently within the optimum range for shrimp farming. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in survival rates between the different treatments (p&#62;0.05). Nevertheless, the 500 g/ha single-cell probiotic treatment showed the least variation in survival rate, indicating more stable culture conditions. In terms of growth performance, the highest mean final weight was observed in the 300 g/ha of probiotic treatment. Although this difference was not statistically significant compared to the 400 g/ha treatment, it was significantly higher than that of 500 g/ha and control groups. The highest specific growth rate (SGR) was recorded in the 400 g/ha treatment, which was not significantly different from other treatments, including the control. The highest average daily growth rate (ADGR) was also recorded in the 300 g/ha group, but no statistically significant differences were observed between treatments. For live biomass, the 300 g/ha treatment yielded the highest values and showed a statistically significant difference compared to the 500 g/ha group. Feed consumption was highest in the control group and was significantly higher than in the other treatments. The lowest feed conversion ratio (FCR) was found in the 300 g/ha treatment, which differed significantly only from the control group.

Discussion and conclusion
Probiotics play a crucial role in improving growth performance in aquaculture by optimising metabolic processes and creating favourable ecological conditions (Liu et al., 2009; Todorov et al., 2024; Tao et al., 2025). Their enzymatic activity improves digestion and nutrient uptake, leading to better growth results (Ghosh et al., 2023; Calcagnile et al., 2025). In the present study, water quality parameters such as temperature, salinity, and pH remained within the optimal range, which is consistent with the findings of Naik and Srinivasulu Reddy (2020b) and Van Wyk and Scarpa (1999), who emphasized the importance of a stable environment for shrimp health. Survival rates showed no significant differences between treatments, which is consistent with previous Biofloc studies (Naik and Srinivasulu Reddy, 2020b), although the 500 g/ha probiotic treatment showed greater stability. In particular, the 300 g/ha treatment gave better results for final weight, biomass, and feed conversion ratio (FCR), outperforming the manufacturer‑recommended dose. This result contrasts with Llario et al. (2020), who reported limited growth benefits from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alone, but supports studies emphasizing the improved efficacy of probiotics when used in combination (Souza et al., 2012; Qiu et al., 2023; Preena et al., 2025). The addition of carbon sources such as molasses and rice bran contributed to improved water quality and plankton density, which is consistent with the results of Naik and Srinivasulu Reddy (2020a), Menaga et al. (2023), and Aparna et al. (2024). These improvements probably supported the observed growth and feed efficiency. The synergistic effects of probiotics and biofloces reduction of microbial load, immune stimulation and supplementary nutrition; are well documented (Serra et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2024; Marimuthu et al., 2024) and were reflected in the result of the present study, with FCR values around 2 and final weights between 13.21 and 20.80g. Overall, the use of 300 g/ha of single-cell probiotic proved to be more effective than the recommended dose and provided both biological and economic benefits. This supports the view that optimised probiotic dosing in conjunction with carbon supplementation and biofloc management can significantly improve the sustainability and productivity of shrimp aquaculture (Khanjani et al., 2024; Ziaei-Nejad et al., 2006; Megahed et al., 2019; Kaya et al., 2022). Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that future research focus on the synergistic application of multi-strain probiotic formulations in combination with optimized carbon sources. This approach can further improve growth performance, feed efficiency, and environmental stability in intensive shrimp aquaculture systems. In addition, adjusting probiotic dosing based on empirical evidence rather than manufacturer guidelines may improve both biological efficacy and economic sustainability.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no known financial conflicts of interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work presented in this article. 
Acknowledgment
The authors sincerely express their appreciation to all colleagues and experts who provided assistance at various stages of this research. This study was financially supported by Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, under the research project entitled &#8220;Improving the growth performance and survival of Pacific white shrimp (L. vannamei) through the addition of probiotics and biofloc to pond water&#8221; (Project ID: 21‑484‑02).</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>75</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>91</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/52025/08/262025/10/102025/11/222023/11/222025/08/2
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/5/11
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/04/302026/02/8
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/11/19
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>رسول</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>قربانی</Family>
				<NameE>Rasoul</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ghorbani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>rasoulghorbani@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>سید عباس</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>حسینی</Family>
				<NameE>Seyed Abbas</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hosseini</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>seyedabbas_hosseini@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>فاطمه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>عباسی</Family>
				<NameE>Fatemeh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Abbasi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>f.abbasi59@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>میثم</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>سبزه</Family>
				<NameE>Meysam</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sabzeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>meysam.sabzeh2002@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>حدیثه</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>کشیری</Family>
				<NameE>Hadiseh</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kashiri</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hadiskashiri@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>عبدالعظیم</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>فاضل</Family>
				<NameE>Abdol Azim</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fazel</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>مرکز تحقیقات ذخایر آبزیان آبهای داخلی، استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>f.fazel58@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Biofloc</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Single cell probiotic</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Pacific white shrimp</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Shrimp culture</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Growth performance</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>بیوفلاک</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>پروبیوتیک تک‌سل</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>میگوی پاسفید غربی</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>پرورش میگو</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>شاخص رشد</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Abdel-Rahim, M.M., Elhetawy, A.I., Mansour, A.T., Mohamed, R.A., Lotfy, A.M., Sallam, A.E. and Shahin, S.A., 2024. Effect of long-term dietary supplementation with lavender, Lavandula angustifolia, oil on European seabass growth performance, innate immunity, antioxidant status, and organ histomorphometry. Aquaculture International, 32(3): 3275-3293. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-023-01322-1.##Akbary P., Mirozehi J., Mirozehi Z. and Aramoon A., 2024. Investigation of growth performance and digestive enzymes whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed with combined extract of brown macroalgae (MPE) and the single-cell probiotic Bacillus subtilis. Aquaculture Sciences, 12(2): 54-67. (in Persian)##Amiin, M.K., Lahay, A.F., Putriani, R.B., Reza, M., Putri, S.M.E., Sumon, M.A.A., Jamal, M.T. and Santanumurti, M.B., 2023. The role of probiotics in vannamei shrimp aquaculture performance–A review. Veterinary World, 16(3): 638-  649. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.638-649.##Angahar, L.T., 2016. Applications of probiotics in aquaculture. American Journal of Current Microbiology. 4(1):66-79.##Aparna, Y., Banafsha, S.H. and Reddy, M.S., 2024. Monoculture and mixed culture of pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon in biofloc system: a comparative study. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 26(3): 87-106. DOI: 10.9734/AJFAR/2024/v26i3749.##Bairagi, A., Sarkar Ghosh, K., Sen, S.K. and Ray, A.K., 2002. Enzyme producing bacterial flora isolated from fish digestive tracts. Aquaculture International, (10): 109-121. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021355406412. ##Calcagnile, M., Quarta, E., Sicuro, A., Pecoraro, L., Schiavone, R., Tredici, S.M., Talà, A., Corallo, A., Verri, T., Stabili, L. and Alifano, P., 2025. Effect of Bacillus velezensis MT9 on Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus) Intestinal Microbiota. Microbial Ecology, 88(1):37. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-025-02531-2.##Caputo, A., Bondad‐Reantaso, M.G., Karunasagar, I., Hao, B., Gaunt, P., Verner‐Jeffreys, D., Fridman, S. and Dorado‐Garcia, A., 2023. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: A global analysis of literature and national action plans. Reviews in Aquaculture, 15(2): 568-578. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12741.##Chaikaew, P., Rugkarn, N., Pongpipatwattana, V. and Kanokkantapong, V., 2019. Enhancing ecological-economic efficiency of intensive shrimp farm through in-out nutrient budget and feed conversion ratio. Sustainable Environment Research, (29): 1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s42834-019-0029-0.##Cheng, A.C., Ballantyne, R., Chiu, S.T. and Liu, C.H., 2023. Microencapsulation of Bacillus subtilis E20 probiotic, a promising approach for the enrichment of intestinal microbiome in white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Fishes, 8(5): 264. DOI: 10.3390/fishes8050264.##Dalmin, G., Kathiresan, K. and Purushothaman., A., 2001. Effect of probiotics on bacterial population and health status of shrimp in culture pond ecosystem. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 39(9): 939-942.##Dash, P., Tandel, R.S., Bhat, R.A.H., Mallik, S., Pandey, N.N., Singh, A.K. and Sarma, D., 2018. The addition of probiotic bacteria to microbial floc: Water quality, growth, non-specific immune response and disease resistance of Cyprinus carpio in mid-Himalayan altitude. Aquaculture, (495): 961-969. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.056.##De Silva, M.L.I., Ranjula, M.A.S., Thanuja, M., Katuwawala, D. and Sumanapala, A.P., 2021. Review on impacts of Litopenaeus vannamei on aquaculture. WildLanka, 9(1):149-170.##El‐Sayed, A.F.M., 2021. Use of biofloc technology in shrimp aquaculture: a comprehensive review, with emphasis on the last decade. Reviews in Aquaculture, 13(1): 676-705. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12494.##Fadel, A., Khafage, A., Abdelsalam, M. and Abdel-Rahim, M.M., 2025. Comparative evaluation of three herbal extracts on growth performance, immune response, and resistance against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Litopenaeus vannamei. BMC veterinary research, 21(1):166. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04588-0.##FAO, 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture opportunities and challenges. 1-244.##Ghosh, K., Harikrishnan, R., Mukhopadhyay, A. and Ringø, E., 2023. Fungi and actinobacteria: alternative probiotics for sustainable aquaculture. Fishes, 8(12): 575. DOI: 10.3390/fishes8120575.##Golestan Province Fisheries Directorate., 2011. Performance report on shrimp farming at the Gomishan Aquatic Training and Extension Center. Iran: Golestan Province Fisheries Directorate. 85 pp. (in Persian)##Gullian, M., Thompson, F. and Rodriguez, J., 2004. Selection of probiotic bacteria and study of their immunostimulatory effect in Penneaus vannamei. Aquaculture, (233): 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.09.013.##Hoseinifar, S.H., Sun, Y.Z., Wang, A. and Zhou, Z., 2018. Probiotics as means of diseases control in aquaculture, a review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Frontiers in microbiology, (9): 2429. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02429.##Huang, G., Kong, J., Tian, J., Luan, S., Liu, M., Luo, K., Tan, J., Cao, J., Dai, P., Qiang, G. and Xing, Q., 2025. Genetic Parameter Estimation of Body Weight and Vp AHPND Resistance in Two Strains of Penaeus vannamei. Animals, 15(9):1266. DOI: 10.3390/ani15091266.##Iber, B.T., Benjamin, I. C., Nor, M. N. M., Abdullah, S. R.S., Shafie, M.S.B., Hidayah, M., Abdullah, M.I. and Kasan, N.A., 2025. Application of Biofloc technology in shrimp aquaculture: A review on current practices, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, p.101675. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101675.##Kautsky, N., Ronnback, P., Tendenglen, M. and Trocell, M., 2000. Ecosystem perspectives on management of disease in shrimp pond farming. Aquaculture, (191):145-161. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00424-5.##Kaya, D., 2025. Improvement of brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) culture parameters through dietary enriched synbiotic in a biofloc system. Aquaculture International, 33(3):1-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-025-01909-w.##Kaya, D., Genc, E., Palić, D., Genc, M.A., Todorović, N., Sevgili, H., Vasiljević, M., Kanyılmaz, M. and Guroy, D., 2022. Effect of dietary modified zeolite (clinoptilolite) on growth performance of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) in the recirculating aquaculture system. Aquaculture Research, 53(4):1284-1292. DOI: 10.1111/are.15662.##Khanjani, M.H., Sharifinia, M., Akhavan-Bahabadi, M. and Emerenciano, M.G.C., 2024a. Probiotics and phytobiotics as dietary and water supplements in biofloc aquaculture systems. Aquaculture Nutrition, 2024(1): 3089887. DOI: 10.1155/anu/3089887.##Khanjani, M.H., Mohammadi, A. and Emerenciano, M.G.C., 2024b. Water quality in biofloc technology (BFT): an applied review for an evolving aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 32(7): 9321-9374. DOI:10.1007/s10499-024-01618-w.##Kumar, S., Shyne Anand, P.S., De, D., Sundaray, J.K., Ananda Raja, R., Biswas, G., Ponniah, A.G., Ghoshal, T.K., Deo, A.D., Panigrahi, A. and Muralidhar, M., 2014. Effects of carbohydrate supplementation on water quality, microbial dynamics and growth performance of giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon). Aquaculture international, 22(2): 901-912. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-013-9715-9.##Kuncha, P., Manoranjini, J., Sirisha, J., Bandeela, S., Penjarla, N.K. and Goud, S.S., 2025. Advanced Aquaculture Management: A Smart System for Optimizing Oxygen Levels, Shrimp Health Monitoring. Smart Factories for Industry 5.0 Transformation, 283-298. DOI: 10.1002/9781394200467.ch15.##Lara-Flores, M., 2011. The use of probiotic in aquaculture: an overview. International Research Journal of Microbiology, 2(12): 471-478.##Li, C., Ge, Z., Dai, L. and Chen, Y., 2025. Integrated application of biofloc technology in aquaculture: A review. Water, 17(14): p.2107. DOI:10.3390/w17142107.##Li, C., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Dai, L., Zhu, W. and Chen, Y., 2023. Optimized utilization of organic carbon in aquaculture biofloc systems: A review. Fishes, 8(9):465. DOI:10.3390/fishes8090465.##Liu, C.H., Chiu, C.S., Ho, P.L. and Wang, S. W., 2009. Improvement in the growth performance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, by a protease producing probiotic, Bacillus subtilis E20, from natto. Journal of Applyed Microbiology, (107): 1031-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672. 2009. 04284.x.##Liu, G., Verdegem, M., Ye, Z., Zhao, J., Xiao, J., Liu, X., Liang, Q., Xiang, K. and Zhu, S., 2025. Advancing Aquaculture Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review of Biofloc Technology Trends, Innovative Research Approaches, and Future Prospects. Reviews in Aquaculture, 17(1):e12970. DOI:10.1111/raq.12970.##Llario F., Romano L.A., Rodilla M., Sebastiá-Frasquet M.T. and Poersch L.H., 2020. Application of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as probiotic for Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) cultivated in a biofloc system. Iranian Journal of  Fisheries Sciences, 19(2): 904-920. DOI:10.22092/ijfs.2018.117852.##Mang, Q., Gao, J., Li, Q., Sun, Y., Xu, G. and Xu, P., 2024. Metagenomic insight into the effect of probiotics on nitrogen cycle in the Coilia nasus aquaculture pond water. Microorganisms, 12(3):627. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030627.##Mansour, A.T., Ashry, O.A., Ashour, M., Alsaqufi, A.S., Ramadan, K.M. and Sharawy, Z. Z., 2022. The optimization of dietary protein level and carbon sources on biofloc nutritive values, bacterial abundance, and growth performances of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) juveniles. Life, 12(6):888. DOI: 10.3390/life12060888.##Marimuthu, S., Puvaneswari, S. and Lakshmanan, R., 2024. Effect of biofloc technology enriches the growth of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 196(7): 3860-3890. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04729-x.##McCusker, S., Warberg, M.B., Davies, S.J., Valente, C.D.S., Johnson, M.P., Cooney, R. and Wan, A.H., 2023. Biofloc technology as part of a sustainable aquaculture system: A review on the status and innovations for its expansion. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries, 3(4): 331-352. DOI:10.1002/aff2.108.##Megahed, M.E., Fathi, M. and Abderhman, A.M., 2019. Molecular investigation on the production of the pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) using##diets based on biofloc meal. Journal of Aquaculture and Marine Biology, 8(6):216-222. DOI: 10.15406/jamb.2019.08.00265.   ##Menaga, M., Rajasulochana, P., Felix, S., Sudarshan, S., Kapoor, A., Gandla, K., Saleh, M.M., Ibrahim, A.E. and El Deeb, S., 2023. Evaluation of biofloc-based probiotic isolates on growth performance and physiological responses in Litopenaeus vannamei. Water, 15(16): p.3010. DOI: 10.3390/w15163010.##Mohammed, E.A.H., Ahmed, A.E.M., Kovács, B. and Pál, K., 2025. The significance of probiotics in aquaculture: a review of research trend and latest scientific findings. Antibiotics, 14(3): p.242. DOI10.3390/antibiotics14030242.##Naik, M.K. and Srinivasulu Reddy, M., 2020a. Effect of biofloc system on growth performance in shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei under different C:N ratios with sugarcane molasses. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 11(5):243-262.##Naik, M.K. and Srinivasulu Reddy, M., 2020b. Performance of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with the addition of probiotics and bioflocs: A field study. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 8(3):286-291.##Najmi, N.,Yahyavi, M. and Haghshenas, A., 2018. Effect of enriched rotifer (Brachionus plicstilis) with probiotic lactobacilli on growth, survival and resistance indicators of western white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 17(1): 11- 20. DOI: 10.22092/IJFS.2018.115581.##Olmos, J., Acosta, M., Mendoza, G. and Pitones, V., 2020. Bacillus subtilis, an ideal probiotic bacterium to shrimp and fish aquaculture that increase feed digestibility, prevent microbial diseases, and avoid water pollution. Archives of microbiology, 202(3): 427- 435. DOI:10.1007/s00203-019-01757-2.##Panigrahi, A., Saranya, C., Sundaram, M., Kannan, S.V., Das, R.R., Kumar, R.S., Rajesh, P. and Otta, S.K., 2018. Carbon: Nitrogen (C: N) ratio level variation influences microbial community of the system and growth as well as immunity of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in biofloc based culture system. Fish and shellfish immunology, (81):329-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.07.035.##Powell, C.D., Tansil, F., France, J. and Bureau, D.P., 2020. Growth trajectory analysis of Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei): Comparison of the specific growth rate, the thermal‐unit growth coefficient and its adaptations. Aquaculture Research, 51(2): 480-489. DOI:10.1111/are.14391.##Pratiwi, R., Hidayat, K.W. and Sumitro, 2020. Production performance of catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell, 1822) cultured with added probiotic Bacillus sp. on biofloc technology. Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health, 9(3): 274- 285. DOI:10.20473/jafh.v9i3.16280.##Preena, P.G., Anjana, J.C. and Rejish Kumar, V.J., 2025. Application of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in aquaculture. In Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture and aquatic environments, (pp. 277-315). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-7320-6_12.##Qiu, Z., Xu, Q., Li, S., Zheng, D., Zhang, R., Zhao, J. and Wang, T., 2023. Effects of probiotics on the water quality, growth performance, immunity, digestion, and intestinal flora of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in the biofloc culture system. Water, 15(6): p.1211. DOI: 10.3390/w15061211.##Rajalakshmi, K., Felix, N., Ranjan, A., Arumugam, U., Nazir, M.I. and Sathishkumar, G., 2025. Effects of diets formulated with different combinations of novel feed ingredients on growth performance, apparent digestibility, digestive enzymes and gene expression activities of Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture International, 33(2): p.120. DOI:10.1007/s10499-024-01803-x.##Rind, K.H., Habib, S.S., Ujan, J.A., Fazio, F., Naz, S., Batool, A.I., Ullah, M., Attaullah, S., Khayyam, K. and Khan, K., 2023. The effects of different carbon sources on water quality, growth performance, hematology, immune, and antioxidant status in cultured Nile Tilapia with biofloc technology. Fishes, 8(10):512. DOI:10.3390/fishes8100512.##Robles‐Porchas, G.R., Gollas‐Galván, T., Martínez‐Porchas, M., Martínez‐Cordova, L.R., Miranda‐Baeza, A. and Vargas‐Albores, F., 2020. The nitrification process for nitrogen removal in biofloc system aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(4): 2228-2249. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12431.##Sabzandish Payesh Consulting Engineers (SAP)., (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment Studies of Vannamei Shrimp Farming in Gomishan Aquaculture Complex. 238 pages. (in Persian)##Salehan, A., Ghorbani, R., Hosseini, S. A., Yelghi, S., Salehi, H. and Amouei-Khuzani, E., 2015. Growth trend of Litopenaeus vannamei and its relationship with physicochemical water factors in Gomishan ponds, Golestan Province. Journal of Aquaculture Development, 9(3): 39- 49. (in Persian)##Santos, S.M., Wasielesky Jr, W., Braga, Í., Zuñiga, R., Rosas, V.T., Christ-Ribeiro, A. and Fóes, G.K., 2024. Use of different stocking densities of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles using&#34; synbiotics&#34;: effects on water quality, microorganisms, bioflocs composition and zootechnical performance. Aquaculture International, 32(5): 6133-6151. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-024-01459-7.##Serra, F.P., Gaona, C.A., Furtado, P.S., Poersch, L.H. and Wasielesky Jr, W., 2015. Use of different carbon sources for the biofloc system adopted during the nursery and grow-out culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture International, 23(6):1325-1339. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-015-9887-6.##Souza, D.M.D., Martins, G.B., Piedras, S.R.N., Pouey, J.L.O.F., Robaldo, R.B. and Leite, F.P.L., 2012. Probiotic actions of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi and Saccharomyces boulardii in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) larvae culture. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, (41): 815-819. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000300048.##Tao, L.T., Wei, D.M., Niu, B., Lu, H., Xiong, J., Sun, W.W. and Shan, X.F., 2025. Bacillus subtilis probiotic enhances ornamental fish survival through ammonia detoxification. Aquaculture International, 33(2):153. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-025-01826-y.##Todorov, S.D., Carneiro, K.O., Lipilkina, T.A., Do, H.K., Miotto, M., De Dea Lindner, J. and Chikindas, M.L., 2024. Beneficial microorganisms for the health-promoting in oyster aquaculture: realistic alternatives. Aquaculture International, 32(7): 10085-10107. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-024-01651-9.##Van Wyk, P. and Scarpa, J., 1999. Water quality requirements and management. Farming marine shrimp in recirculating freshwater systems, (4520): 141-161.##Vidhya Hindu, S. and Thomas, J., 2023. Isolation of Probiotic Bacteria from Gut of the Aquatic Animals. In Aquaculture Microbiology, New York, NY: Springer US. pp 99-103. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3032-7_14.##Vulla, K.E., Mmanda, F.P., Nyangoko, B.P. and Makule, E.E., 2024. Unlocking potential benefits on applications of probiotics in Inland aquaculture industry: a review. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries, 4(6):e70027. DOI: 10.1002/aff2.70027.##Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Chang, Z., Zhang, S., Meng, G. and Li, J., 2025. Comparison of economic and ecological benefits between factory water exchange model and biofloc model based on meta analysis. Aquaculture, (597): p.741907. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741907.##Xie, F., Zhu, T., Zhang, F., Zhou, K., Zhao, Y. and Li, Z., 2013. Using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for remediation of aquaculture water. SpringerPlus, 2(1):119. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-119.##Zhang, H., Cao, X., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, L. and Zhang, Y., 2025. Pilot-scale investigation of an advanced biofloc technology for treating Pacific white shrimp effluent: Performance and insight mechanisms. Aquaculture, (595): p.741552. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741552.##Ziaei-Nejad, S., Rezaei, M.H., Takami, G.A., Lovett, D.L., Mirvaghefi, A.R. and Shakouri, M., 2006. The effect of Bacillus spp. bacteria used as probiotics on digestive enzyme activity, survival and growth in the Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus. Aquaculture, 252(2): 516-524. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.07.021.##Zimmermann, S., Kiessling, A. and Zhang, J., 2023. The future of intensive tilapia production and the circular bioeconomy without effluents: biofloc technology, recirculation aquaculture systems, bio‐RAS, partitioned aquaculture systems and integrated multitrophic aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, (15): 22-31. DOI:10.1111/raq.12744.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>

</ARTICLES>

</JOURNAL>
</XML>
